Nicelucario 
Give me your knees
@dream
Just checked the tags guidelines, and it does. And I saw it in the tags first, honestly.
Just checked the tags guidelines, and it does. And I saw it in the tags first, honestly.
Posts
Search Results
Tagging Discussion » Rating Tags General » Post 22
dream 
TAKING A BREAK
@Nicelucario
oh, really? i completely missed that. now that you say it i see it lol, i must be blind as a bat
i’m not sure, i think it does?
oh, really? i completely missed that. now that you say it i see it lol, i must be blind as a bat
i’m not sure, i think it does?
Tagging Discussion » Rating Tags General » Post 21
Nicelucario
Give me your knees
@dream
Vaginal secretions. Doesn’t that boost the rating to Explicit, or is that just a Derp thing?
Vaginal secretions. Doesn’t that boost the rating to Explicit, or is that just a Derp thing?
Tagging Discussion » Rating Tags General » Post 20
dream
i’m seeing nothing questionable here? it barely even looks suggestive. but i’m not sure maybe i’m just missing something
TAKING A BREAK
i’m seeing nothing questionable here? it barely even looks suggestive. but i’m not sure maybe i’m just missing something
Tagging Discussion » Rating Tags General » Post 19
Nicelucario
Give me your knees
I think that the image below should be Suggestive due to the placement of the hand markings.
Tagging Discussion » Rating Tags General » Post 18
Exedrus
No YoUwU
@Fleetfoot
Alright, thanks for responding!
@LightningBolt
Not quite what I was going for (I probably should’ve worded my second question better). I was more thinking arousal would have the same rating for male vs female. Though that’s something to discuss elsewhere, it seems.
Alright, thanks for responding!
@LightningBolt
Not quite what I was going for (I probably should’ve worded my second question better). I was more thinking arousal would have the same rating for male vs female. Though that’s something to discuss elsewhere, it seems.
Tagging Discussion » Rating Tags General » Post 17
Hoffun Way
On Fire
Hello!
Regarding this from the tag guidelines, under questionable:
Regarding this from the tag guidelines, under questionable:
Characters with visible nude features (such as exposed breasts, detailed bulges, sheaths, etc) presented in sexy poses
“Sexy poses” seems like a vague distinction for
What can suffice for a “sexy pose”?
suggestive and questionable, especially regarding breasts. Can there be more examples or clarifications? What can suffice for a “sexy pose”?
Tagging Discussion » Rating Tags General » Post 16
Fletch 
Administrator
Public Relations
Luna's Pet Woof
@Anonymous #ECA9
Hey there!
Applicable tag is Questionable her vulva is excessively visible through the transparent bikini to the point it can already be considered a full out “visible genital”. Nonetheless it doesn’t have anything in it to warrant all the way to Explicit.
We appreciate that you brought this up to our attention!
Hey there!
Applicable tag is Questionable her vulva is excessively visible through the transparent bikini to the point it can already be considered a full out “visible genital”. Nonetheless it doesn’t have anything in it to warrant all the way to Explicit.
We appreciate that you brought this up to our attention!
Tagging Discussion » Rating Tags General » Post 15
Anonymous #ECA9
But someone changed it to explicit.
>>10084
Is this explicit, questionable, or suggestive? The tag guidelines says
Is this explicit, questionable, or suggestive? The tag guidelines says
Outlines of genitals visible through clothing (cameltoes, detailed bulges, anus ‘cameltoes’)
But someone changed it to explicit.
Tagging Discussion » Rating Tags General » Post 14
LightningBolt
Senior Moderator
Emo siren
@Exedrus
I don’t want to see the latter.
Ratings are not the end-all be-all of searches and filters.
I don’t want to see the latter.
Ratings are not the end-all be-all of searches and filters.
Tagging Discussion » Rating Tags General » Post 13
Fletch
Administrator
Public Relations
Luna's Pet Woof
@Exedrus
Hello there!
This standard was adopted from derpibooru’s concept but adapted to a more mature audience. The standard’s been worked for a really long time and we generally receive good feedback from it. The rating standard also gives a lot of flexibility to filters and galleries.
Just in case of doubt, doing a search query like eg: tag, (explicit OR questionable), tag - will give you both ratings search.
If you’d like to discuss more about the concept behind rating tags please start a new thread since this one should remain focused on clarifying doubts about an image rating. I appreciate the comprehension!
Hello there!
This standard was adopted from derpibooru’s concept but adapted to a more mature audience. The standard’s been worked for a really long time and we generally receive good feedback from it. The rating standard also gives a lot of flexibility to filters and galleries.
Just in case of doubt, doing a search query like eg: tag, (explicit OR questionable), tag - will give you both ratings search.
If you’d like to discuss more about the concept behind rating tags please start a new thread since this one should remain focused on clarifying doubts about an image rating. I appreciate the comprehension!
Tagging Discussion » Rating Tags General » Post 11
CruFox 
Moderator
I like tags
@Nightweaver20xx
The two highest ratings were slightly adjusted recently (but they were different than those on Derpibooru even before) and now it is like that:
-> visible penis that is not erect or visible vulva and as long as there is not contact with either of them = questionable
-> erect penis but as long as there is no sexual contact or sexual liquids on it and the picture is solo = questionable
-> erect penis when there is more than one character or if there is a sexual contact with genitals = explicit
Details:
The two highest ratings were slightly adjusted recently (but they were different than those on Derpibooru even before) and now it is like that:
-> visible penis that is not erect or visible vulva and as long as there is not contact with either of them = questionable
-> erect penis but as long as there is no sexual contact or sexual liquids on it and the picture is solo = questionable
-> erect penis when there is more than one character or if there is a sexual contact with genitals = explicit
Details:
→ Exposed genitals (vulva, penis, etc), as long as there is no sexual contact with them.
→ Images where the main focus are the character’s genitals, or images of butts and nothing else.
→ Whenever an image is warrant the specific tag of morbidly obese
→ No depictions of visible sexual arousal between 2 or more characters.
→ Sexual intercourse (sex)
→ Sexual liquids (precum, cum, vaginal secretions) or lubricants in contact with genitals
→ Masturbation or other sexual contact with genitals.
→ Genital insertions
→ Visible sexual arousal between 2 or more characters.
Tagging Discussion » Rating Tags General » Post 10
Nightweaver20xx
Ah sh*t here we go again
OK so I’m already confused. I just finished changing two tags that had visible male genitalia but were tagged “questionable” when I think they should be tagged “explicit” like on Derpi. Is that different here? Are we more liberal with what we can show? Someone inform me, because I’ve looked around and I can really only go by what I’ve been doing for years on Derpi.
EDIT: Never mind I’m an idiot apparently and didn’t actually read the tagging guidelines. I understand now, it’s different than Derpi.
EDIT: Never mind I’m an idiot apparently and didn’t actually read the tagging guidelines. I understand now, it’s different than Derpi.
Tagging Discussion » Rating Tags General » Post 9
CruFox
Moderator
I like tags
@Fleetfoot
Change the ratings then, they will have that
Change the ratings then, they will have that
Stop! This user is a staff member.
Ask them before reverting their changes.
for future reference ;)
Tagging Discussion » Rating Tags General » Post 8
Fletch
Administrator
Public Relations
Luna's Pet Woof
@CruFox
I suppose all those can be questionable, given these images are solos and there’s really no sexual tension on the images aside the display of genitalia there’s no need to go explicit.
The idea of erection meaning explicit is more of an easy guideline about being sexually aroused but just exposure of the genital half way through it alone is no different than the display of a ‘dry’ vulva.
I suppose all those can be questionable, given these images are solos and there’s really no sexual tension on the images aside the display of genitalia there’s no need to go explicit.
The idea of erection meaning explicit is more of an easy guideline about being sexually aroused but just exposure of the genital half way through it alone is no different than the display of a ‘dry’ vulva.
Tagging Discussion » Rating Tags General » Post 7
CruFox
and
Moderator
I like tags
questionable: Detailed genitals (anus, vulva, penis, etc), as long as there is no contact with it, and as long as it does not show arousal
and
explicit: Visible sexual arousal (erect penis, vaginal secretions)
Tagging Discussion » Rating Tags General » Post 5
Tagging Discussion » Rating Tags General » Post 3
AlexMSD
Defiantly suggestive. If I was a wee smol lad who stumbled across this site with mom behind the shoulder, I’d throw whatever device I’m holding if this came up.
:O
I’d say this one could probably stay safe, but is definitely walking that fine line. As for the implied vore, I’d say you’re safe as it’s not necessarily implying that the act of vore has taken place with evidence in the art piece. Just my two cents.
How should this be tagged? >>565Is it safe? The title (SNACKTIME) and tags on FA (vore) make me not sure ;) Does it work like this: vore -> fetish -> not safe? Or not? But is it really vore, the second character is not even in the mouth. In the meantime I used the tags “safe” andimminent vore, but maybe something likeimplied voretoo? I don’t know, those tags need descriptions.For example on Derpibooru there is an image 2260805 tagged as “implied vore” and “questionable” which is only micro swimming in front of an open maw, but then there is image 2194921 tagged with both “imminent vore” and “implied vore” but rated “safe”. By the vore tag description from Derpi:A living being having their head/torso mostly in another or otherwise being eaten.it should just be normalvoreand not justimpliedorimminent, because the character is already in the mouth.
Defiantly suggestive. If I was a wee smol lad who stumbled across this site with mom behind the shoulder, I’d throw whatever device I’m holding if this came up.
Should this besafeorsuggestive?
Tagging Discussion » Rating Tags General » Post 1
CruFox
it should just be normal
Moderator
I like tags
How should this be tagged? >>565
Is it safe? The title (SNACKTIME) and tags on FA (vore) make me not sure ;) Does it work like this: vore -> fetish -> not safe? Or not? But is it really vore, the second character is not even in the mouth. In the meantime I used the tags “
For example on Derpibooru there is an image 2260805 tagged as “
Is it safe? The title (SNACKTIME) and tags on FA (vore) make me not sure ;) Does it work like this: vore -> fetish -> not safe? Or not? But is it really vore, the second character is not even in the mouth. In the meantime I used the tags “
safe” and imminent vore, but maybe something like implied vore too? I don’t know, those tags need descriptions.For example on Derpibooru there is an image 2260805 tagged as “
implied vore” and “questionable” which is only micro swimming in front of an open maw, but then there is image 2194921 tagged with both “imminent vore” and “implied vore” but rated “safe”. By the vore tag description from Derpi:A living being having their head/torso mostly in another or otherwise being eaten.
it should just be normal
vore and not just implied or imminent, because the character is already in the mouth.Tagging Discussion » Rating Tags General » Topic Opener
Fletch
Administrator
Public Relations
Luna's Pet Woof
Hey there everyone!
This thread is for Rating Tags discussion specifically. If you as an user ever have any doubts on what would be the appropriate Rating Tag for an image you’re welcome to voice the matter here.
Please provide a link to the image using the >>1 format and state your doubt, a Staff Member will analyse the case and provide the image with it’s correct Rating Tag.
We kindly ask everyone not to engage in “Tag Wars” with other users regarding Rating Tag of an image, always defer to a Staff Member verdict.
Best regards,
This thread is for Rating Tags discussion specifically. If you as an user ever have any doubts on what would be the appropriate Rating Tag for an image you’re welcome to voice the matter here.
Please provide a link to the image using the >>1 format and state your doubt, a Staff Member will analyse the case and provide the image with it’s correct Rating Tag.
We kindly ask everyone not to engage in “Tag Wars” with other users regarding Rating Tag of an image, always defer to a Staff Member verdict.
Best regards,
Showing results 126 - 149 of 149 total
Default search
If you do not specify a field to search over, the search engine will search for posts with a body that is similar to the query's word stems. For example, posts containing the words winged humanization, wings, and spread wings would all be found by a search for wing, but sewing would not be.
Allowed fields
| Field Selector | Type | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
author | Literal | Matches the author of this post. Anonymous authors will never match this term. | author:Joey |
body | Full Text | Matches the body of this post. This is the default field. | body:test |
created_at | Date/Time Range | Matches the creation time of this post. | created_at:2015 |
id | Numeric Range | Matches the numeric surrogate key for this post. | id:1000000 |
my | Meta | my:posts matches posts you have posted if you are signed in. | my:posts |
subject | Full Text | Matches the title of the topic. | subject:time wasting thread |
topic_id | Literal | Matches the numeric surrogate key for the topic this post belongs to. | topic_id:7000 |
topic_position | Numeric Range | Matches the offset from the beginning of the topic of this post. Positions begin at 0. | topic_position:0 |
updated_at | Date/Time Range | Matches the creation or last edit time of this post. | updated_at.gte:2 weeks ago |
user_id | Literal | Matches posts with the specified user_id. Anonymous users will never match this term. | user_id:211190 |
forum | Literal | Matches the short name for the forum this post belongs to. | forum:meta |