Posts

Should foreskin and circumsized imply human penis here? They do on derpi, but I’m not sure.

I’m fine with tagging other species if it applies, a Rapidash is pretty much a horse after all.

Members of the family Procyonidae which include raccoons, coatis, kinkajous, olingos, olinguitos, ring-tailed cats, and cacomistles.

Mammal from the family Procyonidae, related to raccons, not cats.

See ringtail for the tail color pattern forming rings around it.

Color pattern of stripes on tail that form rings around it.

Think I got them all?

name:hand*

@CruFox
Also, for the second post you made. Here’s an image from Derpi that has some similar aspects of this image. It’s marked suggestive.

Also, this one here is a tad more tame than the one the other, still marked suggestive. So yes, suggestive.

How should this be tagged? >>565

Is it safe? The title (SNACKTIME) and tags on FA (vore) make me not sure ;) Does it work like this: vore -> fetish -> not safe? Or not? But is it really vore, the second character is not even in the mouth. In the meantime I used the tags “safe” and imminent vore, but maybe something like implied vore too? I don’t know, those tags need descriptions.

For example on Derpibooru there is an image 2260805 tagged as “implied vore” and “questionable” which is only micro swimming in front of an open maw, but then there is image 2194921 tagged with both “imminent vore” and “implied vore” but rated “safe”. By the vore tag description from Derpi:

A living being having their head/torso mostly in another or otherwise being eaten.

it should just be normal vore and not just implied or imminent, because the character is already in the mouth.

Should this be safe or suggestive?

This image is blocked by your current filter - click here to display it anyway

your current filter.

Many species of even-toed ruminant indigenous to various regions in Africa and Eurasia. The term is used to describe all members of the family Bovidae that do not fall under the category of sheep, cattle, or goats.

xcom -> x-com
Question: Do we need a distinction between all those “hands on something” and “hand on something” tags?
If not there should be an alias from “hand*s**” form to -> “hand” form.
BTW why does searching for “@hand on**`” doesn’t work?
It obviously should work…
—
Implication as on Derpi:
sound -> animated
sound -> webm
webm -> animated
Because there is no other format that can have sound, right?
–
highres -> high res
high resolution -> high res
and just add descriptions same as on Derpibooru to it, they are here
Also this:
lowres -> low res
low resolution -> low res
But on Derpi there is no description for it. E621 uses less than 500x500, but then they have different values for high resolution too:
https://e621.net/wiki_pages/2799
Actually, if they have it as `hi res@ then there should be another alias because people might be using the e621 tag.
hi res -> high res
hires -> high res
Or maybe even this should be the main tag? I don’t know ;)
BTW: On e621 I think those resolution tags are even added automatically based on image resolution, no user input required.
–
EDIT 1
I created tags heart shaped butt and heart on butt because on Derpibooru there is only heart butt tag which, from what is there, I can assume it means heart shaped butt. Because there are two similar tags but of different meaning they should be distinctive enough. Anyway, they need descriptions now.
heart on butt descriptions:
Short:

Pattern in the shape of heart on the character’s butt

For the butt in the shape of heart see heart shaped butt

Butt in the shape of heart

For the pattern in the shape of heart on butt see heart on butt

@CruFox
I think it might be a little too pedantic to nitpick what’s correct and proper and would require extensive knowledge of each type of animal’s junk to truly judge, which, yes I can do that, but, does anyone really care that much? Plus it could also lead to debates and arguments over “this artist can’t draw proper horse cunts and i hate it” and what not. And that’s probably something worth avoiding.

I do think the tag should be aliased into just ‘animal genitalia’ tho as it was my original idea, is easier to remember, and isn’t as stingy sounding.

@Fleetfoot

There is the anatomically correct genitals tag which should be added universally to all genders and all genitals that fit the criteria of anatomically correct/accurate.

This tag in addition to the other specific tag you’re after eg. canine penis will ensure searching can be done properly always while making tagging far more straight forwards.

Then make all those tags imply it.

 
Actually I’m not sure this is a good idea. Anatomically correct and how people draw penises of specific species can be two different things, here it is shown with examples:
 

This image is blocked by your current filter - click here to display it anyway

your current filter.

 
The better solution would be for all the different “species penis” and “SPECIES vulva” tags to imply “animal genitalia”. And then anatomically correct would be added only where it really is correct and not just when a canine penis has any knot and any pointy tip with urethra anywhere.