Viewing last 25 versions of post by CruFox in topic General Tag Discussion

"[@LightningBolt":](/forums/tagging/topics/general-tag-discussion?post_id=479#post_479
[bq="LightningBolt"])  

> Should "@[`foreskin@":`](/tags/foreskin) and "@[`circumsized@":`](/tags/circumsized) imply "@[`human penis@":`](/tags/human+penis) here? They do on derpi, but I'm not sure.
 
[/bq]
"@`Foreskin@":`](/tags/foreskin) no, because of art like this: "[||https://e621.net/posts/1801832":||](https://e621.net/posts/1801832) or this "[||https://e621.net/posts/1545775":||](https://e621.net/posts/1545775

"@)
 
[`circumcised@":`](/tags/circumcised) I think yes, because nobody would know if some strange animal penis that had a foreskin was circumcised (maybe if it happened in a story, but how likely is that?), it's only known on human ones that they were circumcised.


 
^BTW. you wrote @`circum@`**siz*@*`ed@`, but there is no tag like this, the proper tag and proper spelling is @`circum@`**cis*@*`ed@`^

"@LightningBolt":/forums/tagging/topics/general-tag-discussion?post_id=479#post_479
[bq="LightningBolt"] Should "@foreskin@":/tags/foreskin and "@circumsized@":/tags/circumsized imply "@human penis@":/tags/human+penis here? They do on derpi, but I'm not sure. [/bq]

"@Foreskin@":/tags/foreskin no, because of art like this: "https://e621.net/posts/1801832":https://e621.net/posts/1801832 or this "https://e621.net/posts/1545775":https://e621.net/posts/1545775

"@circumcised@":/tags/circumcised I think yes, because nobody would know if some strange animal penis that had a foreskin was circumcised (maybe if it happened in a story, but how likely is that?), it's only known on human ones that they were circumcised.

^BTW. you wrote @circum@*siz*@ed@, but there is no tag like this, the proper tag and proper spelling is @circum@*cis*@ed@^