Posts

@Gyro  
To find all NSFW: !safe  
To find all SFW: safe  
To find all NSFW, excluding dark and grotesque: !safe, !grimdark  
etc
 
On Derpi on the other hand:  
To find all NSFW: questionable || explicit  
To find all SFW: safe || suggestive  
etc

@Luna  
Does even distribution actually matter though? If anything this would seem to make it harder to find what you’re looking for, since you might have to include questionabke in your search too…

@TexasUberAlles  
Exposed private bits aren’t always explicit. Current tag definitions make the distribution of rating tags a lot more even. There was a lot of blood, sweat, effort, arguments and strong words put into actually deciding the best policy regarding that.

I very much disagree with the tag description for questionable allowing inarguably sexual images which don’t involve two characters. One character in an overtly sexual situation with exposed naughty parts should definitely be tagged as explicit.

nano - One character being exceptionally smaller then normal, often outside the range of normal interaction with a ‘regular’ sized creature.

open beak -Alias> Open Mouth  
licking beak -Alias> licking lips  
bound beak -Alias> bound muzzle

@Extraterrestrial Fluff  
I added the short description, the long one seems too specific and sounds like it is stating some policies that do not actually exist. I made it imply both “irl” and “photo”. The “photo” tag can be used for both irl and drawn photographs (the latter can then be searched by “photo, -irl”).

Tag description suggestions for photographed artwork:
 
Short description: Photographs of drawings, paintings, or artisan creations (sculptures, figures, plushies, et cetera). i.e. The artwork is not scanned or digitally produced.
 
Long description: Images that are photographs of traditionally created artwork, including traditional drawings, traditional paintings, sculptures, figures and figurines, statues, plushies, et cetera. Note that proper scans are always preferred over photographs of traditional media whenever possible. Likewise, 3D models made in digital sculpting and modeling programs such as Blender, Maya or ZBrush should use screenshots of the rendered models. If the artwork (2D or 3D) was digitally produced, then the image files should always be properly saved via the editing program used. They should neither be photographed off the monitor nor printed and then scanned or photographed.
 
EDIT: Er… I see there’s also photo and irl, but I’m also seeing photo being used for drawings of photos. e.g. >>6113

@Anonymous #C287  
Any.

@Anonymous #C287  
Hey!
 
Solo X can be used to any rating on Furbi, including safe.

Do the rules for “Solo X” tags on Derpibooru apply here? In other words, only use those tags on Suggestive or higher? Or do we tag it on any picture with a single character in it regardless of ratings?

@Polymorphic  
Tags’s been updated, cheers!

Short descriptions:  
edit - Posts that were modified by someone other than the original artist(s).  
color edit - Posts that were colored by someone other than the original artist(s).

@Gyro  

 
So?  

@Anonymous #C287  
Plantigrade anthro describes situations where the weight is placed on the entire foot and not only the part near the digits regardless of foot shape, so plantigrade anthro for that part where soles are visible.  

 
On the other hand the character on that part where she is holding the shield looks like she is resting her weight only on the part of her foot near the digits…
 
When feet are presented only in such ambiguous way tagging it as just anthro without neither plantigrade anthro nor digitigrade anthro would be the best option.

 
For pictures like this, is this plantigrade anthro or digitigrade anthro? It’s shaped like a human foot, but it has paw pads.

comic - When multiple panels exist in a single image. For sets of images use comic:<comic name>

@Gyro  
Done (actually already some time ago but I’m only confirming it now).

Planetside should get a franchise tag. :)

Could we change reorganise/realias e6 version?  
It’s shorter and doesn’t imply computer rendering software.
 
eyebrow clipping through hair → eyebrow through hair  
eye clipping through hair → eye through hair

@CruFox  
Yes, I was thinking about that too, to be honest, but decided to go the more simple and consistent way.

@Moon Flower  
As for this post: “tufted ears” should be aliased to “ear tuft”, but I’m not sure about “fluffy tail” becoming “tail fluff”, because of something along this:
 

 
But then one can argue that neck fluff that covers the neck entirely would work the same as fluffy tail, but then if you shave a fluffy neck then the remaining not fluffy neck would be a significant portion of the neck itself but if you shave a tail then there is not much of its volume left.
 
But that argumentation is probably too complicated to be useful, but I wanted to add this nevertheless, for the sake of consistency maybe “fluffy tail” should become “tail fluff” too.

@Moon Flower  

 
Done
 

 
If “edit” already has it then I can’t see a reason why alternate version should not, changed.

It’s me again, sorry.
 
As discussed in Discord, you might consider turning nintendo switch into a yellow official content tag.
 
Also I wonder if alternate version will get a special tag flag as on Derpibooru, blue like edit.

I don’t know if it should be a new thread, if so then let me know, please.
 
I noticed all tags with “tuft” and “fluff” are inconsistent and it would be easy to conform to something before the site exits beta.
 
tuft  
Either alias tufted x to x tuft, or the other way around, but consistently for any body part.  
tufted x example: tufted ears  
x tuft examples: ear tuft, head tuft, neck tuft, ||ball tuft ||  
I personally prefer x tuft, it is shorter and “tufted ears”, the only representant of tufted x, has only a count of 7.
 
fluff  
Same in green but with fluff, either alias fluffy x to x fluff, or the other way around, but consistently for any body part.  
fluffy x example: fluffy tail  
x fluff examples: chest fluff, ear fluff, neck fluff, cheek fluff, ||pubic fluff ||, cheek fluff, leg fluff, head fluff, and more with a count of < 10.  
I personally prefer x fluff for consistency compared to my opinion on tuft. Again, it is shorter and while “fluffy tail” is the most used tag of all, any other tag is represented as x fluff only and some of their counts are considerably high too.