Posts
Search Results
Tagging Discussion » Rating Tags, Guidelines and You » Post 22
Teaspoon 
Moderator
still using a ps/2 kb
@Raptorshy
Could use collapsible sections to still have a list there, for those that really like lists or are chronically unsure and nervous.
Could use collapsible sections to still have a list there, for those that really like lists or are chronically unsure and nervous.
Tagging Discussion » Rating Tags, Guidelines and You » Post 21
Parashy 
Personal opinion time.
I’d rather remove 9/10 of examples on every rating and give a 2 sentence description instead that people will actually read. I’m in a mod position and every time I’ve needed to rate something I’d glaze my eyes down the list like “yeah that’s way too much to take in, I’m just gonna look for similar content and see how they rated it”, and I’m sure that’s how most people will handle it since most people don’t like reading a ton of stuff for something they barely cared about to begin with. Edge cases will fall on either side and those can be handled as they come. If there’s any concerns we can just uprate it and call it a day. It’s really not that big of an issue and it’s never going to be bulletproof.
Also I’m gonna be blunt and say that I don’t care about anything the MPAA says about ratings, even as arguments. They handle a vastly different set of content and they are in place for very different reasons. Furthermore they aren’t even particularly good with what they do handle, let alone trying to apply its standards to what is mostly a pile of saucy furry porn.
That’s my thoughts anyways.
I’d rather remove 9/10 of examples on every rating and give a 2 sentence description instead that people will actually read. I’m in a mod position and every time I’ve needed to rate something I’d glaze my eyes down the list like “yeah that’s way too much to take in, I’m just gonna look for similar content and see how they rated it”, and I’m sure that’s how most people will handle it since most people don’t like reading a ton of stuff for something they barely cared about to begin with. Edge cases will fall on either side and those can be handled as they come. If there’s any concerns we can just uprate it and call it a day. It’s really not that big of an issue and it’s never going to be bulletproof.
Also I’m gonna be blunt and say that I don’t care about anything the MPAA says about ratings, even as arguments. They handle a vastly different set of content and they are in place for very different reasons. Furthermore they aren’t even particularly good with what they do handle, let alone trying to apply its standards to what is mostly a pile of saucy furry porn.
That’s my thoughts anyways.
Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 40
Tagging Discussion » Rating Tags, Guidelines and You » Post 20
Anonymous #77C1
And then for Grimdark:
Looking again after a while…
I have 2 problems with the sexual ratings:
I have 2 problems with the sexual ratings:
Sheaths and balls, as long as they are…
Still missing mention of anuses, which makes it unclear what a non-detailed one is rating-wise. Similarly, it’s still odd that detailed anuses are up with detailed genitals instead of in Suggestive with detailed sheaths and balls.
Sexual fluids and secretions
Why did this revert? This again makes tiny drops of fluid on the floor, a stain in underwear, or a cum jar in the background Explicit. The first two examples are even cases of ambiguity, since they could easily be from a leaky bladder.
I might as well bother to mention dark ratings for once.
I’m not even gonna list out the pieces of Semi-grimdark, cause the whole thing I think needs rewriting. I would recommend the following to replace its bulleted contents:
I might as well bother to mention dark ratings for once.
I’m not even gonna list out the pieces of Semi-grimdark, cause the whole thing I think needs rewriting. I would recommend the following to replace its bulleted contents:
Minor (non-gory) bodily horror, including:
-Untreated mortal wounds, such as bullet wounds, stab wounds, fresh amputations
-Freshly-severed major body parts, like limbs or heads
-Bones/skeletons with bits of flesh
-Large amounts of blood
-Extreme malnutrition
-Asphyxiation
-Obvious bodily signs of significant abuse
Minorly horrific abuse, such as being prepared to be raped, having a gun pressed to the head, being beaten bloody, or dubious/pressured consent
And then for Grimdark:
Realistic intense injuries/gore, such as guts spilling out, bits of muscle hanging, or blood-drenched bones
Horrific abuse, such as rape, torture, or torturous death
Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 38
CruFox 
Moderator
I like tags
Some tag descriptions:
detailed: Might be used during
EDIT: I already did some of those above, so I’m moving them below this line:
detailed: Don’t use when the only part of face that is in contact with a penis is mouth.
detailed: Don’t use when the only part of face that is in contact with balls is mouth.
detailed: often depicted as pressed against a surface when a character is lying on their stomach on that surface.
intercrural sex - when a penis of one character is placed between thighs of other character and rubbed against them to create friction. pillow humping - when a character is rubbing their genitalia against a pillow. scissors position - when partners intercross their spread legs together. detailed: Might be used during
tribadism, frotting, penetration or usage of double-headed dildoEDIT: I already did some of those above, so I’m moving them below this line:
oral - when mouth or tongue is used for sexual stimulation or masturbation. hotdogging - when a character is rubbing their penis between other character’s butt cheeks. tribadism - when two or more characters are rubbing their vulvas together. frotting - when two or more characters are rubbing their penises together. cunnilingus - oral sex performed on vulva or vagina.arabian goggles - balls placed over eyes. penis on face - when a penis is in contact with character’s face. detailed: Don’t use when the only part of face that is in contact with a penis is mouth.
balls on face - when a penis is in contact with character’s face. detailed: Don’t use when the only part of face that is in contact with balls is mouth.
180 penis - when a penis is positioned parallel to the character’s legs with its tip pointing towards the character’s feet, at 180° angle to what it would usually be. detailed: often depicted as pressed against a surface when a character is lying on their stomach on that surface.
Tagging Discussion » Basic implications and aliases » Post 74
CruFox
Aliases for orientation tags, although I personally don’t thing “gender1 x gender2” is the best version to have as the main tag, it is the main tag for the time being, so:
◦
◦
◦
◦
◦
◦
◦
◦
◦
Implications:
◦
◦
•
•
◦
•
•
•
•
•
EDIT:
•
EDIT 2:
Alias:
◦
EDIT 3:
Implication:
•
•
•
•
EDIT 4:
•
EDIT 5:
Alias:
◦
Moderator
I like tags
The post above is aleady old and long enough, so I’m making another one to bump this thread up.
—–
EDIT: I marked the ones that are done with • and the ones that are not with ◦ symbols
—–
EDIT: I marked the ones that are done with • and the ones that are not with ◦ symbols
Aliases for orientation tags, although I personally don’t thing “gender1 x gender2” is the best version to have as the main tag, it is the main tag for the time being, so:
◦
male/male -> male x male ◦
m/m -> male x male ◦
male on male -> male x male◦
male/female -> male x female ◦
female/male -> male x female ◦
m/f -> male x female ◦
f/m -> male x female ◦
male on female -> male x female ◦
female on female -> male x femaleImplications:
◦
topless -> partial nudity ◦
wardrobe malfunction -> partial nudity•
cum on penis -> penis •
cum on penis -> cum◦
pillow humping -> grinding•
arabian goggles -> balls on face •
arabian goggles -> balls •
arabian goggles -> nudity•
balls on face -> balls •
balls on face -> nudityEDIT:
•
footjob should not imply sex as the description states that it is a tag for masturbation too.EDIT 2:
Alias:
◦
veiny cock -> veiny penisEDIT 3:
Implication:
•
kitsune (fire emblem) -> kemonomimi •
kitsune (fire emblem) -> humanoid•
wolfskin (fire emblem) -> kemonomimi •
wolfskin (fire emblem) -> humanoidEDIT 4:
•
hotdogging should NOT imply intercrural sexEDIT 5:
Alias:
◦
ballgag -> ball gagTagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 37
LightningBolt 
Senior Moderator
Emo siren
@Wingbeat
They also need ‘solo X’ tags for them as well as any traces of those were nuked from orbit for some reason.
They also need ‘solo X’ tags for them as well as any traces of those were nuked from orbit for some reason.
Tagging Discussion » [NSFW] Grinding definition and connected tags (with visual examples) » Topic Opener
CruFox
In my opinion
Short description:
By the Derpibooru definition it should also not be used for
Visual examples
This would be just
This would be
This would be grinding and
And this could possibly be
This might be too as it’s not yet because there is no but there is contact of genitals with body:
>>1723
(Edit: As for the thing above, I don’t think it should be
This would not be grinding because its
But then there also are pictures like this:
It could be said that this would not be grinding because balls/penis is just placed on someone’s face, no indication of rubbing, but it’s not like movement can be seen if it’s just a static picture, so should this be
And then this? It even kind of looks like rubbing, so it would technically count.
There are no relevant search results for “
If images of genitals in contact with face are not intended to be tagged as
Moderator
I like tags
There is a tag on Derpibooru called “grinding” with this desctiption:
To rub one’s crotch against an object or another person, such as their partner’s leg, a male’s penis, a female’s vulva or table corner, to the enjoyment of both the rub-er and the rub-ee. Distinct from tribadism and hotdogging.
In my opinion
grinding on Furbooru should be phrased differently so that it would be more clear and also include males.Short description:
Act of rubbing one’s genitals against body of another character or against an object.
Detailed description:
Examples: vagina against a penis (but without penetration), penis against balls, penis or vagina against a pillowNote that this tag should not be used for:
By the Derpibooru definition it should also not be used for
hotdogging, but then why exactly? I can’t find a reason. All non-penetrative rubbing except rubbing of the same genitals (vulva-vulva and penis-penis) could be just tagged with grinding, and then some of them with hotdogging as well, where applicable.Visual examples
This would be just
grinding:
This would be
grinding and pillow humping (there is a ^tag named that on Derpi^ and it clearly is used for both males and females):
This would be grinding and
intercrural sex:
And this could possibly be
grinding and hotdogging:
~~grinding~~ ~~anal~~ ~~penetration~~ (so just imminent anal ) (Edit: As for the thing above, I don’t think it should be
grinding in this form as the penis is just clearly about to be inserted into the anus, but grinding would be just rubbing the anus with penis without the intent to actually put it inside so this image is not a good example of that.)This would not be grinding because its
tribadism or frotting:
But then there also are pictures like this:
It could be said that this would not be grinding because balls/penis is just placed on someone’s face, no indication of rubbing, but it’s not like movement can be seen if it’s just a static picture, so should this be
grinding?And then this? It even kind of looks like rubbing, so it would technically count.
There are no relevant search results for “
grinding, penis on face” on Derpibooru except one single animation where there is clearly rubbingIf images of genitals in contact with face are not intended to be tagged as
grinding then the description could be modified to include: Act of rubbing one’s genitals against body of another character (except for the head) or against an object.
Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 36
Wingbeat
Fun is mandatory
It’s been about a week since it was last mentioned, but is there any progress on the intersex tag situation? As a tl;dr suggestion I think we should adopt e621’s usage of the terms “andromorph” and “gynomorph” as the basic intersex terminology.
A more complete explanation is as follows:
I’ve been on a number of different sites that have handled this to varying degrees of success, and I favor this one for two main reasons. One, familiarity - it’s what e621 uses atm and furries who have used that board will be comfortable working with them. Two, more importantly, they’re “lore-agnostic,” in that it makes no assumptions about what gender a character identifies as (unlike
Additionally, I think the tags
Finally, it would make it possible for the transgender tags to imply them as well, which I think they should, as there are effectively two ways to tag an intersex character atm and that could cause problems for people trying to filter that.
A more complete explanation is as follows:
I’ve been on a number of different sites that have handled this to varying degrees of success, and I favor this one for two main reasons. One, familiarity - it’s what e621 uses atm and furries who have used that board will be comfortable working with them. Two, more importantly, they’re “lore-agnostic,” in that it makes no assumptions about what gender a character identifies as (unlike
penis on female etc) or whether this is natural or surgical (as mtf transgender does).Additionally, I think the tags
penis on female and vagina on male are a bit ambiguous as to their meaning out of context - I have already seen one uploader interpret it rather literally as an orientation tag, and that’s a headache I expect we’ll see more of if the tag is kept, because although they’re listed as gender tags in the quick tag box, that distinction isn’t there on the Tag Guidelines page. Andromorph/gynomorph, by comparison, might be unfamiliar terms, but they aren’t ambiguous. And, as I’ve already mentioned, furries who’ve browsed e621 would already be familiar so that is less of a concern.Finally, it would make it possible for the transgender tags to imply them as well, which I think they should, as there are effectively two ways to tag an intersex character atm and that could cause problems for people trying to filter that.
Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 35
Teaspoon
Moderator
still using a ps/2 kb
@CruFox
I wouldn’t think watermark and signature are necessarily exclusive; I just want to avoid them being lumped together as the same thing as people would filter “watermark” and miss out on images with subtle/unobtrusive signatures (which happened on derpi early on).
I wouldn’t think watermark and signature are necessarily exclusive; I just want to avoid them being lumped together as the same thing as people would filter “watermark” and miss out on images with subtle/unobtrusive signatures (which happened on derpi early on).
Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 33
Teaspoon
Watermarks are over the image to spoil its printing/copying, signatures are in a corner or follow the contour / gaps of an image.
vs
Grin, but not happy.
Smile, not happy or grin.
Happy, not grin.
Likely a holdback from derpi when the physical heart organ was “heart” while the ♥ was “love heart”. Don’t care what the distinction is as long as it exists.
Moderator
still using a ps/2 kb
(just interjecting for things I’m invested in)
watermark — what’s a difference between this and a signature? If the watermark is just the artist name but written in semi-transparent capital letters is it signature and watermark at the same time?
Watermarks are over the image to spoil its printing/copying, signatures are in a corner or follow the contour / gaps of an image.
vs
grin vs smiling vs happy — differences?
Grin, but not happy.
Smile, not happy or grin.
Happy, not grin.
Why there is a tag called love heart but also another one called heart?
Likely a holdback from derpi when the physical heart organ was “heart” while the ♥ was “love heart”. Don’t care what the distinction is as long as it exists.
Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 32
CruFox
Are butt cheeks and thighs the same thing? I don’t think so, so there should be no such implication.
Moderator
I like tags
Here is list of tags that I think should have a descriptions but I’m nut sure what this description should be or even what some of the tags here are for, so I can’t write them myself:
And whats the difference between
Why there is a tag called
There is also
but harness on a parachutist or somebody who climbs mountains is not really connected to riding horses, so
By the way on e621 there is a tag called bondage gear but it’s not implied by anything. You can use all the things used for bondage in a “normal” way after all.
EDIT: Why does
Hotdogging description from Derpibooru is:
winking vs vulvar winking vs one eye closed - differences between those partial nudity - is this just common tag for bottomless and toples? And what about wardrobe malfunction? shipping - currently no description, should this be the same as on Derpi? speech bubble vs dialogue vs talking eeveelution - this needs a description to clarify what this is bra - does parts of bikini covering breasts count as this? And whats the difference between
lingerie, panties and underwear? All should have a description. watermark - what’s a difference between this and a signature? If the watermark is just the artist name but written in semi-transparent capital letters is it signature and watermark at the same time?grin vs smiling vs happy - differences?fluffy - what is this exactly, it’s implied only by fluffy tailintersex - this is an important tag so it needs a descriptionWhy there is a tag called
love heart but also another one called heart?teats vs nipples vs breasts vs udders - descriptions needed for allThere is also
tack, and from the implications (bridle, harness, lead) I could guess that it is meant to be this:but harness on a parachutist or somebody who climbs mountains is not really connected to riding horses, so
tack should not be implied by harness.By the way on e621 there is a tag called bondage gear but it’s not implied by anything. You can use all the things used for bondage in a “normal” way after all.
EDIT: Why does
hotdogging implies intercrural sex?Hotdogging description from Derpibooru is:
When a male rubs his penis between another male or female’s butt cheeks without penetrating the anus.
(By the way, why this description even mentions gender? It should be “When a penis is rubbed between another character’s butt cheeks without penetrating the anus.” because it can be a herm, doesn’t have to be a male.)
intercrural sex definition from Wikipedia is:
intercrural sex definition from Wikipedia is:
Intercrural sex (from inter- and Latin crura, “legs”), also known as femoral/interfemoral sex, is a type of non-penetrative sex, where the penis is placed between the receiving partner’s thighs (often with lubrication) and thrusts to create friction.
Are butt cheeks and thighs the same thing? I don’t think so, so there should be no such implication.
Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 31
LightningBolt
Senior Moderator
Emo siren
@CruFox
I don’t see it as nessesary as I would assume a majority of fursuit stuff would not be that, and also thst it wouldn’t matter.
But maybe others agree and I’m crazy idk.
I don’t see it as nessesary as I would assume a majority of fursuit stuff would not be that, and also thst it wouldn’t matter.
But maybe others agree and I’m crazy idk.
Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 30
CruFox
Moderator
I like tags
@LightningBolt
I thought about making this separate seeing how otherwise there would be always two artist tags on
I thought about making this separate seeing how otherwise there would be always two artist tags on
draw over pictures with fursuits.Tagging Discussion » OC tag problems » Post 4
Parashy
@Anonymous #B060
There’s definitely a distinction, I just don’t think it matters as much.
@CruFox
You make a fair point about needing staff to change the type. Needing a thread to update tag type to character is not something I want to waste everyone’s time on. So I’m good keeping both.
There’s definitely a distinction, I just don’t think it matters as much.
@CruFox
You make a fair point about needing staff to change the type. Needing a thread to update tag type to character is not something I want to waste everyone’s time on. So I’m good keeping both.
Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 29
LightningBolt
Senior Moderator
Emo siren
@CruFox
Why can’t they just be
Why can’t they just be
artist? They’re still artists, as are plushie makers and other crafters. Art is art.Tagging Discussion » OC tag problems » Post 3
Anonymous #B060
Can you explain why this is? I think there is a reasonable, meaningful distinction to be made between someone’s fursona, and say,
There’s less of a reason to make a distinction between media-originated characters and someone’s fursona here than at derpi, and the lines are a bit murkier here.
Can you explain why this is? I think there is a reasonable, meaningful distinction to be made between someone’s fursona, and say,
judy hopps.Tagging Discussion » "not furry" content » Post 5
CruFox
Moderator
I like tags
@Teaspoon
There is even a person who has xenomorph as their fursona: https://www.furaffinity.net/user/snakehead404/
There is even a person who has xenomorph as their fursona: https://www.furaffinity.net/user/snakehead404/
Showing results 4201 - 4225 of 4484 total
Default search
If you do not specify a field to search over, the search engine will search for posts with a body that is similar to the query's word stems. For example, posts containing the words winged humanization, wings, and spread wings would all be found by a search for wing, but sewing would not be.
Allowed fields
| Field Selector | Type | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
author | Literal | Matches the author of this post. Anonymous authors will never match this term. | author:Joey |
body | Full Text | Matches the body of this post. This is the default field. | body:test |
created_at | Date/Time Range | Matches the creation time of this post. | created_at:2015 |
id | Numeric Range | Matches the numeric surrogate key for this post. | id:1000000 |
my | Meta | my:posts matches posts you have posted if you are signed in. | my:posts |
subject | Full Text | Matches the title of the topic. | subject:time wasting thread |
topic_id | Literal | Matches the numeric surrogate key for the topic this post belongs to. | topic_id:7000 |
topic_position | Numeric Range | Matches the offset from the beginning of the topic of this post. Positions begin at 0. | topic_position:0 |
updated_at | Date/Time Range | Matches the creation or last edit time of this post. | updated_at.gte:2 weeks ago |
user_id | Literal | Matches posts with the specified user_id. Anonymous users will never match this term. | user_id:211190 |
forum | Literal | Matches the short name for the forum this post belongs to. | forum:meta |