Viewing last 25 versions of post by CruFox in topic General Tag Discussion

Here is list of tags that I think should have a descriptions but I'm nut sure what this description should be or even what some of the tags here are for, so I can't write them myself:

"@
 
[`winking@":`](/tags/winking) vs "@[`vulvar winking@":`](/tags/vulvar+winking) vs "@[`one eye closed@":`](/tags/one+eye+closed) - differences between those
"@  
[`partial nudity@":`](/tags/partial+nudity) - is this just common tag for "@[`bottomless@":`](/tags/bottomless) and "@[`toples@":`](/tags/topless)? And what about "@[`wardrobe malfunction@":`](/tags/wardrobe+malfunction)?
"@  
[`shipping@":`](/tags/shipping) - currently no description, should this be the same as on Derpi?
"@  
[`speech bubble@":`](/tags/speech+bubble) vs "@[`dialogue@":`](/tags/dialogue) vs "@[`talking@":`](/tags/talking
"@)  
[`eeveelution@":`](/tags/eeveelution) - this needs a description to clarify what this is
"@  
[`bra@":`](/tags/bra) - does parts of bikini covering breasts count as this?
 
And whats the difference between @`lingerie@`, @`panties@` and @`underwear@`? All should have a description.
"@  
[`watermark@":`](/tags/watermark) - what's a difference between this and a signature? If the watermark is just the artist name but written in semi-transparent capital letters is it signature and watermark at the same time?

"@
 
[`grin@":`](/tags/) vs "@[`smiling@":`](/tags/) vs "@[`happy@":`](/tags/) - differences?

"@
 
[`fluffy@":`](/tags/fluffy) - what is this exactly, it's implied only by "@[`fluffy tail@":`](/tags/fluffy+tail

"@)
 
[`intersex@":`](/tags/intersex) - this is an important tag so it needs a description


 
Why there is a tag called "@[`love heart@":`](/tags/love+heart) but also another one called "@[`heart@":`](/tags/heart)?

"@
 
[`teats@":`](/tags/teats) vs "@[`nipples@":`](/tags/nipples) vs "@[`breasts@":`](/tags/breasts) vs "@[`udders@":`](/tags/udders) - descriptions needed for all


 
There is also "@[`tack@":`](/tags/tack), and from the implications ("@[`bridle@":`](/tags/bridle), "@[`harness@":`](/tags/harness), "@[`lead@":`](/tags/lead)) I could guess that it is meant to be this:


 
 
!

![full](https://i.imgur.com/19gyZKW.png!

)
 
but harness "[on a parachutist":](https://cdn10.picryl.com/photo/1982/12/01/a-member-of-the-parachute-test-team-flys-a-suspended-harness-trainer-at-the-9f29b6-1600.jpg) or "[somebody who climbs mountains":](https://outdoorgearlab-mvnab3pwrvp3t0.stackpathdns.com/photos/19/1/311629_4968_L.jpg) is not really connected to riding horses, so @`tack@` should +__not+__ be implied by @`harness@`.


 
By the way on e621 there is a tag called "[bondage gear":](https://e621.net/wiki_pages/5551) but it's not implied by anything. You can use all the things used for bondage in a "normal" way after all.


 
EDIT: Why does "@[`hotdogging@":`](/tags/hotdogging) implies "@[`intercrural sex@":`](/tags/intercrural+sex)?


 
Hotdogging description from Derpibooru is:
[bq]  

> When a male rubs his penis between another male or female's **butt cheeks** without penetrating the anus.[/bq]
(By the way, why this description even mentions gender? It should be "_*When a penis is rubbed between another character's butt cheeks without penetrating the anus._*" because it can be a herm, doesn't have to be a male.)


 
intercrural sex definition from Wikipedia is:

[bq]
 

> Intercrural sex (from inter- and Latin crura, "legs"), also known as femoral/interfemoral sex, is a type of non-penetrative sex, where the penis is placed between the receiving partner's **thighs** (often with lubrication) and thrusts to create friction.[/bq]



 
Are **butt cheeks** and **thighs** the same thing? I don't think so, so there should be no such implication.

Here is list of tags that I think should have a descriptions but I'm nut sure what this description should be or even what some of the tags her are for, so I can't write them myself:

"@winking@":/tags/winking vs "@vulvar winking@":/tags/vulvar+winking vs "@one eye closed@":/tags/one+eye+closed - differences between those
"@partial nudity@":/tags/partial+nudity - is this just common tag for "@bottomless@":/tags/bottomless and "@toples@":/tags/topless? And what about "@wardrobe malfunction@":/tags/wardrobe+malfunction?
"@shipping@":/tags/shipping - currently no description, should this be the same as on Derpi?
"@speech bubble@":/tags/speech+bubble vs "@dialogue@":/tags/dialogue vs "@talking@":/tags/talking
"@eeveelution@":/tags/eeveelution - this needs a description to clarify what this is
"@bra@":/tags/bra - does parts of bikini covering breasts count as this?
And whats the difference between @lingerie@, @panties@ and @underwear@? All should have a description.
"@watermark@":/tags/watermark - what's a difference between this and a signature? If the watermark is just the artist name but written in semi-transparent capital letters is it signature and watermark at the same time?

"@grin@":/tags/ vs "@smiling@":/tags/ vs "@happy@":/tags/ - differences?

"@fluffy@":/tags/fluffy - what is this exactly, it's implied only by "@fluffy tail@":/tags/fluffy+tail

"@intersex@":/tags/intersex - this is an important tag so it needs a description

Why there is a tag called "@love heart@":/tags/love+heart but also another one called "@heart@":/tags/heart?

"@teats@":/tags/teats vs "@nipples@":/tags/nipples vs "@breasts@":/tags/breasts vs "@udders@":/tags/udders - descriptions needed for all

There is also "@tack@":/tags/tack, and from the implications ("@bridle@":/tags/bridle, "@harness@":/tags/harness, "@lead@":/tags/lead) I could guess that it is meant to be this:

!https://i.imgur.com/WRyBN4e.png!

!https://i.imgur.com/19gyZKW.png!

but harness "on a parachutist":https://cdn10.picryl.com/photo/1982/12/01/a-member-of-the-parachute-test-team-flys-a-suspended-harness-trainer-at-the-9f29b6-1600.jpg or "somebody who climbs mountains":https://outdoorgearlab-mvnab3pwrvp3t0.stackpathdns.com/photos/19/1/311629_4968_L.jpg is not really connected to riding horses, so @tack@ should +not+ be implied by @harness@.

By the way on e621 there is a tag called "bondage gear":https://e621.net/wiki_pages/5551 but it's not implied by anything. You can use all the things used for bondage in a "normal" way after all.

EDIT: Why does "@hotdogging@":/tags/hotdogging implies "@intercrural sex@":/tags/intercrural+sex?

Hotdogging description from Derpibooru is:
[bq]When a male rubs his penis between another male or female's *butt cheeks* without penetrating the anus.[/bq](By the way, why this description even mentions gender? It should be "_When a penis is rubbed between another character's butt cheeks without penetrating the anus._" because it can be a herm, doesn't have to be a male.)

intercrural sex definition from Wikipedia is:

[bq]Intercrural sex (from inter- and Latin crura, "legs"), also known as femoral/interfemoral sex, is a type of non-penetrative sex, where the penis is placed between the receiving partner's *thighs* (often with lubrication) and thrusts to create friction.[/bq]

Are *butt cheeks* and *thighs* the same thing? I don't think so, so there should be no such implication.

Here is list of tags that I think should have a descriptions but I'm nut sure what this description should be or even what some of the tags her are for, so I can't write them myself:

"@winking@":/tags/winking vs "@vulvar winking@":/tags/vulvar+winking vs "@one eye closed@":/tags/one+eye+closed - differences between those
"@partial nudity@":/tags/partial+nudity - is this just common tag for "@bottomless@":/tags/bottomless and "@toples@":/tags/topless? And what about "@wardrobe malfunction@":/tags/wardrobe+malfunction?
"@shipping@":/tags/shipping - currently no description, should this be the same as on Derpi?
"@speech bubble@":/tags/speech+bubble vs "@dialogue@":/tags/dialogue vs "@talking@":/tags/talking
"@eeveelution@":/tags/eeveelution - this needs a description to clarify what this is
"@bra@":/tags/bra - does parts of bikini covering breasts count as this?
And whats the difference between @lingerie@, @panties@ and @underwear@? All should have a description.
"@watermark@":/tags/watermark - what's a difference between this and a signature? If the watermark is just the artist name but written in semi-transparent capital letters is it signature and watermark at the same time?

"@grin@":/tags/ vs "@smiling@":/tags/ vs "@happy@":/tags/ - differences?

"@fluffy@":/tags/fluffy - what is this exactly, it's implied only by "@fluffy tail@":/tags/fluffy+tail

"@intersex@":/tags/intersex - this is an important tag so it needs a description

Why there is a tag called "@love heart@":/tags/love+heart but also another one called "@heart@":/tags/heart?

"@teats@":/tags/teats vs "@nipples@":/tags/nipples vs "@breasts@":/tags/breasts vs "@udders@":/tags/udders - descriptions needed for all

There is also "@tack@":/tags/tack, and from the implications ("@bridle@":/tags/bridle, "@harness@":/tags/harness, "@lead@":/tags/lead) I could guess that it is meant to be this:

!https://i.imgur.com/WRyBN4e.png!

!https://i.imgur.com/19gyZKW.png!

but harness "on a parachutist":https://cdn10.picryl.com/photo/1982/12/01/a-member-of-the-parachute-test-team-flys-a-suspended-harness-trainer-at-the-9f29b6-1600.jpg or "somebody who climbs mountains":https://outdoorgearlab-mvnab3pwrvp3t0.stackpathdns.com/photos/19/1/311629_4968_L.jpg is not really connected to riding horses, so @tack@ should +not+ be implied by @harness@.

By the way on e621 there is a tag called "bondage gear":https://e621.net/wiki_pages/5551 but it's not implied by anything. You can use all the things used for bondage in a "normal" way after all.

EDIT: Why does "@hotdogging@":/tags/hotdogging implies "@intercrural sex@":/tags/intercrural+sex?

Hotdogging description from Derpibooru is:
[bq]When a male rubs his penis between another male or female's *butt cheeks* without penetrating the anus.[/bq]By the way, why this description even mentions gender? It should be "_When a penis is rubbed between another character's butt cheeks without penetrating the anus._" because it can be a herm, doesn't have to be a male.

intercrural sex definition from Wikipedia is:

[bq]Intercrural sex (from inter- and Latin crura, "legs"), also known as femoral/interfemoral sex, is a type of non-penetrative sex, where the penis is placed between the receiving partner's *thighs* (often with lubrication) and thrusts to create friction.[/bq]

Are *butt cheeks* and *thighs* the same thing? I don't think so, so there should be no such implication.

Here is list of tags that I think should have a descriptions but I'm nut sure what this description should be or even what some of the tags her are for, so I can't write them myself:

"@winking@":/tags/winking vs "@vulvar winking@":/tags/vulvar+winking vs "@one eye closed@":/tags/one+eye+closed - differences between those
"@partial nudity@":/tags/partial+nudity - is this just common tag for "@bottomless@":/tags/bottomless and "@toples@":/tags/topless? And what about "@wardrobe malfunction@":/tags/wardrobe+malfunction?
"@shipping@":/tags/shipping - currently no description, should this be the same as on Derpi?
"@speech bubble@":/tags/speech+bubble vs "@dialogue@":/tags/dialogue vs "@talking@":/tags/talking
"@eeveelution@":/tags/eeveelution - this needs a description to clarify what this is
"@bra@":/tags/bra - does parts of bikini covering breasts count as this?
And whats the difference between @lingerie@, @panties@ and @underwear@? All should have a description.
"@watermark@":/tags/watermark - what's a difference between this and a signature? If the watermark is just the artist name but written in semi-transparent capital letters is it signature and watermark at the same time?

"@grin@":/tags/ vs "@smiling@":/tags/ vs "@happy@":/tags/ - differences?

"@fluffy@":/tags/fluffy - what is this exactly, it's implied only by "@fluffy tail@":/tags/fluffy+tail

"@intersex@":/tags/intersex - this is an important tag so it needs a description

Why there is a tag called "@love heart@":/tags/love+heart but also another one called "@heart@":/tags/heart?

"@teats@":/tags/teats vs "@nipples@":/tags/nipples vs "@breasts@":/tags/breasts vs "@udders@":/tags/udders - descriptions needed for all

There is also "@tack@":/tags/tack, and from the implications ("@bridle@":/tags/bridle, "@harness@":/tags/harness, "@lead@":/tags/lead) I could guess that it is meant to be this:

!https://i.imgur.com/WRyBN4e.png!

!https://i.imgur.com/19gyZKW.png!

but harness "on a parachutist":https://cdn10.picryl.com/photo/1982/12/01/a-member-of-the-parachute-test-team-flys-a-suspended-harness-trainer-at-the-9f29b6-1600.jpg or "somebody who climbs mountains":https://outdoorgearlab-mvnab3pwrvp3t0.stackpathdns.com/photos/19/1/311629_4968_L.jpg is not really connected to riding horses, so @tack@ should +not+ be implied by @harness@.

By the way on e621 there is a tag called "bondage gear":https://e621.net/wiki_pages/5551 but it's not implied by anything. You can use all the things used for bondage in a "normal" way after all.

EDIT: Why does "@hotdogging@":/tags/hotdogging implies "@intercrural sex@":/tags/intercrural+sex?

Hotdogging description from Derpibooru is:
[bq]When a male rubs his penis between another male or female's *butt cheeks* without penetrating the anus.[/bq]

intercrural sex definition from Wikipedia is:

[bq]Intercrural sex (from inter- and Latin crura, "legs"), also known as femoral/interfemoral sex, is a type of non-penetrative sex, where the penis is placed between the receiving partner's *thighs* (often with lubrication) and thrusts to create friction.[/bq]

Are *butt cheeks* and *thighs* the same thing? I don't think so, so there should be no such implication.

Here is list of tags that I think should have a descriptions but I'm don'ut sure what this descriptionk Ishould be or even know what some of those tags shoulder mare for, so I can't write them myself:

"@winking@":/tags/winking vs "@vulvar winking@":/tags/vulvar+winking vs "@one eye closed@":/tags/one+eye+closed - differences between those
"@partial nudity@":/tags/partial+nudity - is this just common tag for "@bottomless@":/tags/bottomless and "@toples@":/tags/topless? And what about "@wardrobe malfunction@":/tags/wardrobe+malfunction?
"@shipping@":/tags/shipping - currently no description, should this be the same as on Derpi?
"@speech bubble@":/tags/speech+bubble vs "@dialogue@":/tags/dialogue vs "@talking@":/tags/talking
"@eeveelution@":/tags/eeveelution - this needs a description to clarify what this is
"@bra@":/tags/bra - does parts of bikini covering breasts count as this?
And whats the difference between @lingerie@, @panties@ and @underwear@? All should have a description.
"@watermark@":/tags/watermark - what's a difference between this and a signature? If the watermark is just the artist name but written in semi-transparent capital letters is it signature and watermark at the same time?

"@grin@":/tags/ vs "@smiling@":/tags/ vs "@happy@":/tags/ - differences?

"@fluffy@":/tags/fluffy - what is this exactly, it's implied only by "@fluffy tail@":/tags/fluffy+tail

"@intersex@":/tags/intersex - this is an important tag so it needs a description

Why there is a tag called "@love heart@":/tags/love+heart but also another one called "@heart@":/tags/heart?

"@teats@":/tags/teats vs "@nipples@":/tags/nipples vs "@breasts@":/tags/breasts vs "@udders@":/tags/udders - descriptions needed for all

There is also "@tack@":/tags/tack, and from the implications ("@bridle@":/tags/bridle, "@harness@":/tags/harness, "@lead@":/tags/lead) I could guess that it is meant to be this:

!https://i.imgur.com/WRyBN4e.png!

!https://i.imgur.com/19gyZKW.png!

but harness "on a parachutist":https://cdn10.picryl.com/photo/1982/12/01/a-member-of-the-parachute-test-team-flys-a-suspended-harness-trainer-at-the-9f29b6-1600.jpg or "somebody who climbs mountains":https://outdoorgearlab-mvnab3pwrvp3t0.stackpathdns.com/photos/19/1/311629_4968_L.jpg is not really connected to riding horses, so @tack@ should +not+ be implied by @harness@.

By the way on e621 there is a tag called "bondage gear":https://e621.net/wiki_pages/5551 but it's not implied by anything. You can use all the things used for bondage in a "normal" way after all.