Basic implications and aliases

@Anonymous #B60F
Done

Note for future myself: This weekend do all the implications

@Satu Putra
Pokemonfanart (and pokemonart) was nuked, only two images dont deserve an alias in my opinnion and was easy to manually fix :^P

@CrystalLord
The same here, the last only have one image, compared to the other with several. Meanwhile mods debate if it need to be alised, I put all images under the same tag :^P

@KoloMl
This was difficult to me. I decided in the end, delete the lipstick marks one, and leave kiss marks, meanwhile put in all the former images the later tag. Why? Kiss mark have the implies, and also more images under that tag.

@JenniTheDragon
Done

@Satu Putra
seduction? The tag some mod have to delete tons of your metadata updates about that specific tag? I decided to delete the tag and add seductive where it is needed. Please. Dont add the tag anymore and then ask if can be alised xD Simply, dont add it and all good.

About wubbox aliases, I will tell Ciaran or other mod about that, dont worry.

@Satu Putra
That tag dont exist, I believe was nuked time ago xD

Nevermind, taking a look, was in an deleted image for rule 3, you put in there. heavy sigh

@JenniTheDragon
Done at reverse: Motives are the number of images. The imply is good, so I add it.

@Satu Putra
Here we go. I will do this in a completely separate post, too big for combine with others.

@Lil’ Furry
Done, I think that is correct, and will be helpful in future xD, thanks you so much.

@Lil’ Furry
Truly, that need an alias done. Will tell to Ciaran when I got to talk with him.

@Lunarmoon21
I will never be the same… Also, I add the description more acurrately posible. Hope thats works. The alias for now, better leave without it, I really doubt anyone will add that tags to images xD

@Mega-PoNEO
Overinflation vs Inflation. In the end, I decided to delete the overinflation tag. Seems redundant, and checking how many users follow the former, (and also spoiler and hide) and how many follow the later, meanwhile others hides and spoilers, inflation was a winner for excelence. More than that, overinflation and inflation was together in every image I check. Lets use in advance only the inflation tag, it is more useful, and helps to categorize all under the same name.

An example of this can be applied in others tags. Hyper breasts, overrides every type of “how big my hyper breasts are” tags. For example, having hyper breasts, normally if the user follow, they dont mind if they are bigger than the head, torso, or a planet xD, The same with hide or spoiler that tag, someone that hates hyper, will hate normally all types of hyper, be breasts the size of football, or the size of the galaxy. And if they want to be more acurrate with their searchs, always can use multiple tags to remove or focus in what they are searching exatly.

Said all that, I hope you dont mind, seems like you are the one most using that tag in the end.

Also, prase jewelpet one. It is done :^P I dont know by whom, but someone do it faster than me.

Which is not the same as the spell tag, or more commonly called, “ofuda”. Ofuda wikipedia. Personally, I don’t think they will be alised, or even imply each other. they are different things. In any case, will be good to alias spell tag and ofuda, one way or the other. I will note this for later.

@Blissey1
Truly, that is right. Done rn

With all of this, I will go to eat and continue this evening. Thanks to everyone for the help, and hope everythings is correct, I spend several hours thinking and doing changes to tags with care for details xD

@Garka la Garka
Ah so the vast majority of images currently tagged talisman should be changed to spell tag. I just assumed they were equivalent cause of the way the tag has been used

Fixed for now, Truly only one have a true talisman (the zebra one). Maybe it is a good idea put a short description in both tags? It can help a lot in the long run

@Bubbelvatten
As other times, I decided to remove the tag backlit and added blacklighting. Number of images under one vs the other.

@Bubbelvatten
Same as before, delete the tag from the two images in hugging tail, and replace it with tail hug.

@Somedragonguy
My pal fluff have the truth xD, they dont need to be alised.

For the rest, it is done :^P

@Bubbelvatten
Artist alises goes here :^P

Done all except the sataputra mega block, that I need to take a careful look when I am not sleepy xD

@Garka la Garka
Thanks, and apologies for my mistake!

@Bubbelvatten
No need to apologize, you are doing your best for helping us out, and I am very glad with that :^P Thanks you a lot

@Garka la Garka
Thanks

@Lunarmoon21
Your welcome, sorry for being late :^P

ball grab <-> grabbing balls

seashell bra -> seashell, bra

@Somedragonguy
Seems logic, done

What exactly is the difference between against glass and pressed against glass? Both have around the same amount of images, but seem to exist independently of each other. I believe that one should imply the other, if not outright get aliased.

@Bubbelvatten
It is a good question. I believe all start when pressed against glass was used only referring to breasts pressed, but lately users use the both for everything. I, too, believe a merge of tags will be useful.

nondescript nipples -> nipples
sow -> mammal, suid, female
pearl necklace -> necklace, jewelry
eye scar -> scar
nose scar -> scar

And “pig” as well. (“pig” before “female”)

Implications:
good clean married sex
filthy dirty married sex -> sex

Please alias tea cup into teacup.

alias:
wings of fire (book series) -> wings of fire
animal jam (game) -> animal jam

those tags don’t need brackets as franchises, especially that no one would use them on basic basis by how uncommon they are.

Clarence (Series) → Clarence franchise tag implies Cartoon Network

Ear fluff and pointy ears should both imply ears.

@Bubbelvatten
If that were the case, someone would have to go back and tag every single image with ears present.

@Lil’ Furry
I am not quite sure I understand how you mean. There are lots of tags which would have many, many more images associated with them, were they consistently and universally applied (such as ‘countershading’). That does not mean that attempts to improve tagging efforts, including aliasing and implications, are futile.

Judging from how you wrote your comment, it almost seems as if you are under the impression that the ‘ears’ tag does not currently exist, and that I am suggesting creating a new one (please forgive my poor reading comprehension if that is not the case). I assure you that I am not suggesting any new tag here. On the contrary, clicking on the link leads to one of the most common tags that currently exists on this website.

Case in point: we have an ‘ears’ tag, as well as the tags ‘ear fluff’ and ‘pointy ears’. Based solely upon the current state of things, it seems obvious that the two latter ones should imply the former.

@Bubbelvatten
Well, if we’re not careful, every post on here would have at least 50 tags, so every post would have to be tagged “wall of tags”.

@Lil’ Furry
I fail to see how that would be a bad thing. Tags are after all meant to enable enhanced searching and filtering abilities, which is the main reason I find Furbooru to be far superior to every other art website I’ve ever used (only Wikimedia Commons comes close, although its design philosophy is rather different). Every image being tagged with every applicable tag sounds like a dream come true to me. If anything, maybe the ‘wall of tags’ tag should be removed altogether. Of course, I am what you get when you combine a student of library and information science with an autist obsessed with categorization, so I respectfully understand anyone who thinks I am overzealous.