Posts
Search Results
General Discussion » Monster Girl vs Furry » Post 9
Radomila Radon 
✾
@Nicelucario
I think she’s in the monster girl group. She’s also a furry but negligible. My original specie is a scaled humanoid, and multiple tongues.
I think she’s in the monster girl group. She’s also a furry but negligible. My original specie is a scaled humanoid, and multiple tongues.
General Discussion » Monster Girl vs Furry » Post 6
Nicelucario 
Give me your knees
@JesterKatz
Monster Musume (a very popular monster girl manga/anime) has characters like Polt, who are pratically furries (I’ll post an image of her at the end). There’s also some drama on the Monster Musume thread on Derpibooru about what is a monster girl and what is furry, and according to at least one person, nagas and Shepherd0821’s art are furry rather than monster, so it’s a person-by-person thing.
Monster Musume (a very popular monster girl manga/anime) has characters like Polt, who are pratically furries (I’ll post an image of her at the end). There’s also some drama on the Monster Musume thread on Derpibooru about what is a monster girl and what is furry, and according to at least one person, nagas and Shepherd0821’s art are furry rather than monster, so it’s a person-by-person thing.
General Discussion » Monster Girl vs Furry » Post 5
JesterKatz
A broken fool
Monster girls, as best as I can figure out the definition, are typical JRPG monsters made anthropomorphic with traits typical of (sexy) human females. Mythological creatures notwithstanding.
Furries are pretty similar in this regard, being animals made with anthropomorphic traits. So I guess monster girls could count as furries in this context. Granted monster girls can seem more human compared to furries, but still, since they’re based on creatures quite different from humans, I still regard them as being completely non-human, no matter how human they can look. After all, any (physical) monster or animalistic feature possessed, no matter how minor, considerably makes the character non-human by default. Such semantics are getting into the Ship of Theseus kind of argument though, which is more complicating then I’m willing to touch on…
Then again, “furry” can be very vague, even working in reverse (humans made to look animalistic). To that end, since “furry” can be such a broad term, monster girls might as well be “furries,” if only because it can be harder to argue against such an ambiguous definition then for it. Still, maybe the simplest answer is to just regard “monster girls” as an “unintentional” sub-category of furries. Not unlike the ponies of My Little Pony.
Furries are pretty similar in this regard, being animals made with anthropomorphic traits. So I guess monster girls could count as furries in this context. Granted monster girls can seem more human compared to furries, but still, since they’re based on creatures quite different from humans, I still regard them as being completely non-human, no matter how human they can look. After all, any (physical) monster or animalistic feature possessed, no matter how minor, considerably makes the character non-human by default. Such semantics are getting into the Ship of Theseus kind of argument though, which is more complicating then I’m willing to touch on…
Then again, “furry” can be very vague, even working in reverse (humans made to look animalistic). To that end, since “furry” can be such a broad term, monster girls might as well be “furries,” if only because it can be harder to argue against such an ambiguous definition then for it. Still, maybe the simplest answer is to just regard “monster girls” as an “unintentional” sub-category of furries. Not unlike the ponies of My Little Pony.
General Discussion » Monster Girl vs Furry » Post 1
Anonymous #98A9
Maybe we’re the real monsters
Showing results 1 - 11 of 11 total
Default search
If you do not specify a field to search over, the search engine will search for posts with a body that is similar to the query's word stems. For example, posts containing the words winged humanization, wings, and spread wings would all be found by a search for wing, but sewing would not be.
Allowed fields
| Field Selector | Type | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
author | Literal | Matches the author of this post. Anonymous authors will never match this term. | author:Joey |
body | Full Text | Matches the body of this post. This is the default field. | body:test |
created_at | Date/Time Range | Matches the creation time of this post. | created_at:2015 |
id | Numeric Range | Matches the numeric surrogate key for this post. | id:1000000 |
my | Meta | my:posts matches posts you have posted if you are signed in. | my:posts |
subject | Full Text | Matches the title of the topic. | subject:time wasting thread |
topic_id | Literal | Matches the numeric surrogate key for the topic this post belongs to. | topic_id:7000 |
topic_position | Numeric Range | Matches the offset from the beginning of the topic of this post. Positions begin at 0. | topic_position:0 |
updated_at | Date/Time Range | Matches the creation or last edit time of this post. | updated_at.gte:2 weeks ago |
user_id | Literal | Matches posts with the specified user_id. Anonymous users will never match this term. | user_id:211190 |
forum | Literal | Matches the short name for the forum this post belongs to. | forum:meta |