@CruFox
I think it might be a little
too pedantic to nitpick what’s
correct and
proper and would require extensive knowledge of each type of animal’s junk to truly judge, which, yes I can do that, but, does anyone really care that much? Plus it could also lead to debates and arguments over “this artist can’t draw proper horse cunts and i hate it” and what not. And that’s probably something worth avoiding.
It’s not like only one variant of penis or vulva exists for each species and looking just at human ones is enough to prove it, but some general rules apply and drawing urethral opening in a different place is a significant error but drawing different knot shape not so much (also there are so many canine species that I’m sure no one knows how the genitals of every single one look like)
I do think the tag should be aliased into just ‘animal genitalia’ tho as it was my original idea, is easier to remember, and isn’t as stingy sounding.
It could be used alongside animal genitalia
when appriopriate but added always manually. This is how it is on e621.
By the way it’s silly that “dragon penis” implies “anatomically correct genitals”. Like somebody ever saw a real dragon and knows what their dicks look like ;) For this reason the entire tag dragon penis
doesn’t make sense. Any penis on a dragon is dragon penis because there isn’t any truly correct one. Only the animal genitals
tag would apply here, unless the dragon has human cock.
And IMO there should be distinction between animal penis
, animal vulva
and animal anus
in tags.