safe to suggestive and even questionable, even where said artworks only show vore without any sexual indecency. This leaves me with no idea on what rating I should give to prospective vore uploads. I certainly feel that questionable is too harsh for pure vore, but then again, praxis has not always been on my side. I came here to see if vore had already been discussed, but the only relevant post never got any answers from site staff (see here).grimdark rating, which is reached if an artwork features visible lethal digestion. What counts as “visible” in this case? Should >>194456 get a grimdark rating as it features lethal digestion, or would there have to be an internal view as well for it to count as “visible”?
@_Shenki_; the bio contains a link to their links, which includes their Twitter (_Shenki_) and FA (Shenki).
chromatic aberration could be considered flat_colors.flat colors? Does that give you what you’re looking for?This image is toony.
Art that is stylized or simplified in the manner of cartoons and comics. Some of the common features are:Stylized or exaggerated proportions, body shapes, facial features.
Simplified or undefined anatomy, bone structure, musculature.
Use of solid color fills and gradients, not naturalistic textures and lighting.Related tags:
big_eyes
flat_colors
kemono - If a post has a Japanese style to it and features a furry character.See also
chibi
photorealism
realistic
tag group:art
I wanna ask how is this tag supposed to work?
toony means? What is the “distinct cartoony artstyle” that people might be searching for, or that they would wish to hide, that is uniquely identifiable and that can be quantified?toony is different from other tags that refer to a ‘style’ of art, like 2d or 3d or traditional art?toony means you think it looks a certain kind of cartoonish. But how do you turn that into something others can agree with and use too? How do you define it such that everyone else in the community will know what they are going to get when they search for toony, or what they will avoid getting when they filter it?
If you do not specify a field to search over, the search engine will search for posts with a body that is similar to the query's word stems. For example, posts containing the words winged humanization, wings, and spread wings would all be found by a search for wing, but sewing would not be.
| Field Selector | Type | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
author | Literal | Matches the author of this post. Anonymous authors will never match this term. | author:Joey |
body | Full Text | Matches the body of this post. This is the default field. | body:test |
created_at | Date/Time Range | Matches the creation time of this post. | created_at:2015 |
id | Numeric Range | Matches the numeric surrogate key for this post. | id:1000000 |
my | Meta | my:posts matches posts you have posted if you are signed in. | my:posts |
subject | Full Text | Matches the title of the topic. | subject:time wasting thread |
topic_id | Literal | Matches the numeric surrogate key for the topic this post belongs to. | topic_id:7000 |
topic_position | Numeric Range | Matches the offset from the beginning of the topic of this post. Positions begin at 0. | topic_position:0 |
updated_at | Date/Time Range | Matches the creation or last edit time of this post. | updated_at.gte:2 weeks ago |
user_id | Literal | Matches posts with the specified user_id. Anonymous users will never match this term. | user_id:211190 |
forum | Literal | Matches the short name for the forum this post belongs to. | forum:meta |
