Posts

@satuputra796
Tag implications do not need to be correct 100% of the time. Users can always remove implied tags when they are not needed. In huge majority of cases implying the tag “breasts” is the correct thing to do for those tags.

I don’t think breastless clothes, underboob, sideboob, absolute cleavage, cat keyhole bra set, cleavage, and boob window should imply breasts. I can literally imagine flat chested characters with them, even if the tag name has the word ‘breast’ or ‘boob’, and there is an image >>24289 which uses absolute cleavage and flat chest tags at the same time, so should these tags unimply breasts?

Some tag description suggestions:

Tag name: furby Link
Short Description: Furbies are small, fluffy, birdlike creatures with large feet and ears.

Long Description: Furbies are small, fluffy, birdlike creatures with large feet and ears, and the stars of the Furby toy line. Their central gimmick was that their speech would gradually transition from their native “Furbish” language into English the more that they were played with, giving the illusion that they were learning from their owner.
Example image:

Note: The short and long description are taken from the E621 wiki pages.

Tag name: draconic driftway shirt Link
Short Description: T-Shirt that Kosmolisk wears in Draconic Driftway by Jazzberry.

Example image:

What is the right tag for the facial trumpet accessory in my upload?
>>300200t (deleted)
Are upside down headphone, headphones, and musical instrument the right tags used for this image?

@satuputra796
I simply removed all of those hashtag tags from the post and replaced them with whatever was needed since that image was the only tag with those tags and it was about a year old anyway. Not every “bad” tag needs to be aliased.

I found this image and it uses these existing useless tags. Here’s what the aliases of these tags this image uses could be:

Also, why is anthro art an invalid tag? It should ideally alias anthro, instead.

Edit: scalie shouldn’t alias reptile because there are non-reptiles with scales, such as moths, armadillos, pangolins, fishes, and echidnas.

W-what? What are you talking about? :^D

Tsuchinoko is the serpent himself

@Lil’ Furry
Done! The last part you mention incorrectly, sparkly mane implies sparkly hair, not starry hair.

starry hair implies hair.

starry mane implies starry hair.

sparkly hair implies hair.

sparkly mane implies hair, mane, and starry hair.

Note that “starry hair” and “sparkly hair” are not the same thing.

@Anonymous #F5F5
Your question doesn’t have anything to do with this site. Please ask your question on the site your question is for.

@Anonymous #C2D6
Hmmm … yeah, that makes sense. I think we should talk about how to do that first though, since it might be quite a bit of a project.

@Ciaran
Oh thank goodness I found someone who could help out with this. I made a post about this issue in a different forum but it’s still under the same topic and I was hoping for someone to help me out with this. Here is the post I made about the issue that needs to be solved: https://furbooru.org/forums/tagging/topics/rating-tags-general?post_id=38552#post_38552

so, there are posts that use worded numbers for plural bodyparts (e.g two heads, three heads, four arms, etc) and also have written descriptions, but there is ones like “5 fingers”, “4 toes”, etc using only numbers instead of words, which kind of defeats the consistency. should be reworked for both for these?

@Lunarmoon21
I don’t know.

@Ciaran
would a Babylonian dragon (mushussu) be tagged as an eastern or western dragon?

ㅤ

I feel that color wheel challenge should be a pink tag. Just like six fanarts.

Current description for presenting
“When a character is showing their butt and/or genitals to the viewer.”

I feel like it should be changed to “When a character is intentionally showing their butt and/or genitals to the viewer and/or another character.”

So for images like >>237702 (Suggestive) or >>237602 (Questionable), the style of the artist is occasionally to draw just the areola without visible protruding nipple even if it would be visible. Should I just tag such images areola or add the nipples tag?

Related to this: @Somedragonguy

Here is a bunch of tags that have tag counts despite being aliased into something else.
(I imagine in most cases it’s because they are still implied by another tag, but that’s difficult to check without staff tools)

Where do I ask where a franchise should have brown tags? Like say Pokemon Colosseum

Is the tag random island should be pink (fanmade)? You can ask this creator for help. He’s just a new user here, so yeah he’s not good at making specific tags.

The tag is a bit general like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Random_Island

Should we make generation x pokemon tag that any pokemon implicate accordingly to their corrensponsing generation presence? (i.e Piplup implicates generation 4 pokemon tag)

Ripped stockings implies ripped clothes, which is aliased into torn clothes.

This adds an unremovable ripped clothes tag to images.

Since I did not get an answer on another forum (at the bottom of the page), should semi-grimdark no longer be a tag due to it being phased out as a rating tag? Should it be aliased to another tag like invalid tag or grimdark?

If that is not the case, then it would be a good idea to add a description to the tag to avoid confusion in the future.