Compromise
noun: an agreement or a settlement of a dispute that is reached by each side making concessions.
Accepting only a fathest extreme viewpoint position, one more than even the vast majority of conservatives, is not a compromise at all. You don’t sound very intelligent when you make statements like that.
Gun control is any measure that bans or restricts any use, possession, or location of guns in any way. It includes things like age minimums on gun purchases. A full abolition of all gun control would mean it would be legal to sell guns to any 8 year old who walks into a shop, and then for that child to go to school and fire their guns on school grounds. That’s just one of many examples of gun control almost anyone should easily be able to think of off the top of their head.
A full abolition of all gun control would be less gun control than was implemented in the wild west.
I can discuss with and respect people who have some semblance of a thought-out and respectable position on gun control. I can respect someone whose position is that of having no waiting periods and no bans or restrictions related to adult purchases of guns by non-felons. On the flip side, I can also respect someone who believes in banning all magazines over a certain capacity, and raising age minimums to 21 on all purchases and possession.
I don’t agree with either of those positions, but I can respect them because beliefs come from a place of critical thinking and rationale, and both leave some room for healthy, honest, discussion and deliberation.
It is futile to deal with and impossible to respect someone who has the simultaneous positions of, “my way or the highway” and also, “this is the most extreme position someone could possibly have” in one direction or the other. I’d be a little surprised if a person like that didn’t have to either pay, intimidate/abuse, or use alcohol to have sex.