Anonymous #C3A8
All this talk about “focus of the image” is horrifically conditional as well as completely subjective. You can’t define focus and nobody will agree on what it means.
That aside, you mean to say sheathes are Suggestive even when not the focus? These are Safe on Derpi, and many artists there draw them just to vaguely show a character’s sex without being lewd in the slightest, and now this defines them as as lewd as exposed tits from the outset.
What does this mean? At a glance, I’d see this as meaning that “you know what they say about men with big shoes”, a line from Frozen, would be Suggestive, which is bonkers when you also have little kawaii dicks or stick figures humping as Safe.
So, Derpi’s Safe-rated plot shots (many from the show even) or its Suggestive-rated anthro butts now get full Questionable…why? This seems like it’d be putting shots from Spongebob Squarepants, or crops of the recent Trolls movie, at Questionable alongside prominent dicks while outright flashes of tits are only Suggestive.
If you’re going to put something about butts here, you should probably be mentioning anuses instead.
So above, it was said stick figure sex is Safe, but now all sex and insertion is Explicit; which is it? As well, it’s generally rated Questionable on Derpi when characters have their hoof/arm going down between their legs but we can’t really see details or movement. This seems like it would make a lot of funny memes about fapping or sex that aren’t really pornographic Explicit. The insertions thing, if it applies to butts too, also creates some problems; ass shoves are a comedic goldmine and even present in 2 instances in MLP’s Gen 4 (albeit we don’t see much detail).
I think this could be dealt with better by caring about how much is actually shown, spreading them across ratings, and perhaps the insertions across all ratings.
So a girl in a skirt is standing there as a few drops of something hit the floor below, and that’s right up there with full-on porn? Similarly, cum jar memes are outright porn?
I think this could be dealt with better by making these Questionable on their own, but making any emission of them where we can see the source Explicit.
I’m going to just focus on the sexual ratings for now in asking for clarification and providing feedback. No actual suggestions for now, this is…a lot to deal with at once.
@Luna
@Luna
…
suggestive - saucy imagery
→ Partial nudity, such as exposed breasts
→ Bulges and cameltoes, as long as they are not the focus of the image
→ Sheaths, balls, as long as they are not the focus of the image
All this talk about “focus of the image” is horrifically conditional as well as completely subjective. You can’t define focus and nobody will agree on what it means.
That aside, you mean to say sheathes are Suggestive even when not the focus? These are Safe on Derpi, and many artists there draw them just to vaguely show a character’s sex without being lewd in the slightest, and now this defines them as as lewd as exposed tits from the outset.
→ Outright sexual references, jokes, and so on
What does this mean? At a glance, I’d see this as meaning that “you know what they say about men with big shoes”, a line from Frozen, would be Suggestive, which is bonkers when you also have little kawaii dicks or stick figures humping as Safe.
questionable - artistic nudity
…
→ … or images of butts and nothing else
So, Derpi’s Safe-rated plot shots (many from the show even) or its Suggestive-rated anthro butts now get full Questionable…why? This seems like it’d be putting shots from Spongebob Squarepants, or crops of the recent Trolls movie, at Questionable alongside prominent dicks while outright flashes of tits are only Suggestive.
If you’re going to put something about butts here, you should probably be mentioning anuses instead.
explicit - porn
→ Sexual intercourse (sex)
…
→ Genital insertions
→ Masturbation
So above, it was said stick figure sex is Safe, but now all sex and insertion is Explicit; which is it? As well, it’s generally rated Questionable on Derpi when characters have their hoof/arm going down between their legs but we can’t really see details or movement. This seems like it would make a lot of funny memes about fapping or sex that aren’t really pornographic Explicit. The insertions thing, if it applies to butts too, also creates some problems; ass shoves are a comedic goldmine and even present in 2 instances in MLP’s Gen 4 (albeit we don’t see much detail).
I think this could be dealt with better by caring about how much is actually shown, spreading them across ratings, and perhaps the insertions across all ratings.
→ Sexual liquids (precum, cum, vaginal secretions)
So a girl in a skirt is standing there as a few drops of something hit the floor below, and that’s right up there with full-on porn? Similarly, cum jar memes are outright porn?
I think this could be dealt with better by making these Questionable on their own, but making any emission of them where we can see the source Explicit.