Posts
Search Results
Tagging Discussion » Character Tag Categorization. » Post 76
dream 
TAKING A BREAK
@Wingbeat
Alright, that makes sense. But also, “oliver sykes” is yellow?
And yeah the oc thing for mascots makes sense!
Edit: I’m putting Technoblade, Jschlatt and Zelkam as oc tags since they consistently have specific mascots rather than just fan designs and them irl. The others except for Dream I removed (youtuber) from
Alright, that makes sense. But also, “oliver sykes” is yellow?
And yeah the oc thing for mascots makes sense!
Edit: I’m putting Technoblade, Jschlatt and Zelkam as oc tags since they consistently have specific mascots rather than just fan designs and them irl. The others except for Dream I removed (youtuber) from
Tagging Discussion » Character Tag Categorization. » Post 75
Wingbeat 
Fun is mandatory
@dream
Actually, building off of what Cru said, because none of these people belong to YouTube, they wouldn’t get color-coded as yellow. We wouldn’t tag
Also, you really don’t need to add “(youtuber)” to all of these names unless it’s a common word, I think dream is the only one that actually needs it. I’d suggest using an
I’ll color-code
Actually, building off of what Cru said, because none of these people belong to YouTube, they wouldn’t get color-coded as yellow. We wouldn’t tag
keanu reeves as official content, just john wick. Make sense?Also, you really don’t need to add “(youtuber)” to all of these names unless it’s a common word, I think dream is the only one that actually needs it. I’d suggest using an
oc: format tag if the art is of their mascot/avatar, such as oc:jschlatt as a couple examples appear to be.I’ll color-code
youtube though, that’s the tag that deserves categorization.Tagging Discussion » Character Tag Categorization. » Post 74
dream
TAKING A BREAK
Sorry for double post, but these should be yellow in that case:
a6d (youtuber)
badboyhalo (youtuber)
callahan (youtuber)
dream (youtuber)
f1nn5ter (youtuber)
georgenotfound (youtuber)
jschlatt (youtuber)
megapvp (youtuber)
ph1lza (youtuber)
sapnap (youtuber)
skeppy (youtuber)
spifey (youtuber)
tapl (youtuber)
technoblade (youtuber)
tommyinnit (youtuber)
wilbur soot (youtuber)
zelk (youtuber)
Also youtube itself should probably be yellow? Since twitter is :P
a6d (youtuber)
badboyhalo (youtuber)
callahan (youtuber)
dream (youtuber)
f1nn5ter (youtuber)
georgenotfound (youtuber)
jschlatt (youtuber)
megapvp (youtuber)
ph1lza (youtuber)
sapnap (youtuber)
skeppy (youtuber)
spifey (youtuber)
tapl (youtuber)
technoblade (youtuber)
tommyinnit (youtuber)
wilbur soot (youtuber)
zelk (youtuber)
Also youtube itself should probably be yellow? Since twitter is :P
Tagging Discussion » Species Listing » Post 143
soccy-draws 
Madness!
There are 2 more… species tags that are looming out there right now, all courtesy of twokinds.
Both should imply “twokinds”
keidran -> A group of mammals, anthro wolves, foxes or various shapes and sizes of (big?) cats within twokinds universe basitin -> A group of mammals, similar to, but still distinct from keidran within twokinds universeBoth should imply “twokinds”
Tagging Discussion » Character Tag Categorization. » Post 72
CruFox 
It looks like it’s just a human drawn in a simple style, like the things TheOdd1sOut draws:
so this is not even anthro.
Site Rule #3 states that:
As for:
I think it should be technoblade (youtuber) and not (youtube), because he was not created by youtube :P
Moderator
I like tags
@dream
Real people are tagged like this (yellow tag). If those people created the character themselves and it has a different name than their name it should be oc:name (like rags, but he is also an actual furry :P), if it’s just making an animal version of the real person then it should be tagged as that person.
Also I don’t think this should be uploaded:
Real people are tagged like this (yellow tag). If those people created the character themselves and it has a different name than their name it should be oc:name (like rags, but he is also an actual furry :P), if it’s just making an animal version of the real person then it should be tagged as that person.
Also I don’t think this should be uploaded:
Dream’s smiley face / blob character (unsure if this would fit under non-furry anthro content? i feel like it would from looking at what’s currently under the not furry tag but idk)
It looks like it’s just a human drawn in a simple style, like the things TheOdd1sOut draws:
so this is not even anthro.
Site Rule #3 states that:
• Additionally, as defined in the not furry tag, the following is permitted, as long as it is appropriately tagged with the “not furry” tag:
◦ Non-furry images in furry settings/series, like a page of a comic about furry character and a human that only shows the human.
◦ Non-furry anthropomorphic content, such as robots, sapient objects, or most types of aliens.
◦ Furry adjacent/derived content, such as humanizations of furry characters or non-furry representations.
◦ Other fandom art that presents value to the site, which is judged on a case-by-case basis by the site staff.
As for:
For example would I tag Technoblade as “oc:technoblade” or “technoblade (youtube)”? Might be a silly question, I might be overthinking it.
I think it should be technoblade (youtuber) and not (youtube), because he was not created by youtube :P
Tagging Discussion » Character Tag Categorization. » Post 71
dream
TAKING A BREAK
Question - how would one go about tagging YouTuber personas? Would they be OCs, or character tags? Curious because I was going to upload some images of Minecraft YouTubers that have furry content or non-furry anthro content
I.E.
Dream & GeorgeNotFound and their pet ender dragon
Technoblade & Jschlatt
Dream’s smiley face / blob character (unsure if this would fit under non-furry anthro content? i feel like it would from looking at what’s currently under the not furry tag but idk)
Dream, GeorgeNotFound & Sapnap as cats
You get the gist. Basically I’m just wondering how these personas would be tagged if I uploaded images with them. For example would I tag Technoblade as “oc:technoblade” or “technoblade (youtube)”? Might be a silly question, I might be overthinking it.
I.E.
Dream & GeorgeNotFound and their pet ender dragon
Technoblade & Jschlatt
Dream’s smiley face / blob character (unsure if this would fit under non-furry anthro content? i feel like it would from looking at what’s currently under the not furry tag but idk)
Dream, GeorgeNotFound & Sapnap as cats
You get the gist. Basically I’m just wondering how these personas would be tagged if I uploaded images with them. For example would I tag Technoblade as “oc:technoblade” or “technoblade (youtube)”? Might be a silly question, I might be overthinking it.
Tagging Discussion » General Tag Discussion » Post 61
Gyro 
Piaow Birb!
open beak -Alias> Open Mouth
licking beak -Alias> licking lips
bound beak -Alias> bound muzzle
licking beak -Alias> licking lips
bound beak -Alias> bound muzzle
Tagging Discussion » [NSFW] Vore Related Tags » Post 12
CruFox
I don’t like the use of the word “consumed” in regards to things that are not mouth in descriptions for those:
I can’t alias:
Those do not exist:
Moderator
I like tags
vore
object swallowing
mawplay - but I don’t know if this should imply vore, it now does but I didn’t set it up like this, it was already like that
imminent vore
predation
vore
hard vore
oral vore
small pred
digestion
disposal
pellet
I don’t like the use of the word “consumed” in regards to things that are not mouth in descriptions for those:
I can’t alias:
Those do not exist:
Tagging Discussion » Basic implications and aliases » Post 115
CruFox
Also new ones:
horte cuisine (mlp) -> savoir fare (mlp) (https://mlp.fandom.com/wiki/Savoir_Fare )
blues (mlp) -> noteworthy (mlp) (https://mlp.fandom.com/wiki/Noteworthy )
EDIT
Alias:
x-ray -> x-ray picture - alias to a more precise name so that people are not using this for internal views.
Moderator
I like tags
This one was missed:
Also new ones:
horte cuisine (mlp) -> savoir fare (mlp) (https://mlp.fandom.com/wiki/Savoir_Fare )
blues (mlp) -> noteworthy (mlp) (https://mlp.fandom.com/wiki/Noteworthy )
EDIT
Alias:
x-ray -> x-ray picture - alias to a more precise name so that people are not using this for internal views.
Tagging Discussion » Character Tag Categorization. » Post 70
Radomila Radon
✾
Franchise:
Oggy and the Cockroaches
Implies
Xilam (should be in yellow tag also)
Alias:
oatc
Characters:
Oggy (oatc)
Implies:
Jack (oatc)
Implies:
Monica (oatc)
Implies:
Olivia (oatc)
Implies:
Dee Dee (oatc)
Implies:
Marky (oatc)
Implies:
Joey (oatc)
Implies:
Oggy and the Cockroaches
Implies
Xilam (should be in yellow tag also)
Alias:
oatc
Characters:
Oggy (oatc)
Implies:
Oggy and the Cockroaches XilamJack (oatc)
Implies:
Oggy and the Cockroaches XilamMonica (oatc)
Implies:
Oggy and the Cockroaches XilamOlivia (oatc)
Implies:
Oggy and the Cockroaches XilamDee Dee (oatc)
Implies:
Oggy and the Cockroaches XilamMarky (oatc)
Implies:
Oggy and the Cockroaches XilamJoey (oatc)
Implies:
Oggy and the Cockroaches XilamTagging Discussion » Species supertags » Post 31
CruFox
Moderator
I like tags
@soccy-draws
This thread is not about setting species as species type tags but about how should fictional species be tagged, should a fictional animal with fur get the “mammal” tag or should a bird-like pokemon get the “bird” tag ;) Thread for just setting species tag to their brown color is here: https://furbooru.org/forums/tagging/topics/species-listing
This thread is not about setting species as species type tags but about how should fictional species be tagged, should a fictional animal with fur get the “mammal” tag or should a bird-like pokemon get the “bird” tag ;) Thread for just setting species tag to their brown color is here: https://furbooru.org/forums/tagging/topics/species-listing
Tagging Discussion » Species supertags » Post 30
Tagging Discussion » Character Tag Categorization. » Post 69
soccy-draws
Madness!
kat (twokinds) (I think this can be safe to be aliased to “kathrin (twokinds)” )
Tagging Discussion » Character Tag Categorization. » Post 68
dream
TAKING A BREAK
Working on uploading Lapfox related images so here’s some related tags.
Franchise: lapfox trax
Characters:
emma essex (lapfox)
download (lapfox)
eugene (lapfox)
cambium (lapfox)
heartwood (lapfox)
xylem (lapfox)
the quick brown fox (lapfox) (could also have an alias of tqbf for convenience)
rotteen d’moon (lapfox)
renard queenston (lapfox)
bandetto (lapfox)
nitro (lapfox)
emoticon (lapfox)
mayhem (lapfox)
That’s all for now bc I don’t wanna upload a spammy amount of images but I’ll probably resume uploading Lapfox stuff later :P
Franchise: lapfox trax
Characters:
emma essex (lapfox)
download (lapfox)
eugene (lapfox)
cambium (lapfox)
heartwood (lapfox)
xylem (lapfox)
the quick brown fox (lapfox) (could also have an alias of tqbf for convenience)
rotteen d’moon (lapfox)
renard queenston (lapfox)
bandetto (lapfox)
nitro (lapfox)
emoticon (lapfox)
mayhem (lapfox)
That’s all for now bc I don’t wanna upload a spammy amount of images but I’ll probably resume uploading Lapfox stuff later :P
Tagging Discussion » Character Tag Categorization. » Post 67
Fletch 
Administrator
Public Relations
Luna's Pet Woof
@Hoffun Way
@Radomila Radon
@Hoffun Way
@dream
Hey there everyone!
All tags have been updated!
Cheers~
@Radomila Radon
@Hoffun Way
@dream
Hey there everyone!
All tags have been updated!
Cheers~
Tagging Discussion » Rating Tags General » Post 11
CruFox
Moderator
I like tags
@Nightweaver20xx
The two highest ratings were slightly adjusted recently (but they were different than those on Derpibooru even before) and now it is like that:
-> visible penis that is not erect or visible vulva and as long as there is not contact with either of them = questionable
-> erect penis but as long as there is no sexual contact or sexual liquids on it and the picture is solo = questionable
-> erect penis when there is more than one character or if there is a sexual contact with genitals = explicit
Details:
The two highest ratings were slightly adjusted recently (but they were different than those on Derpibooru even before) and now it is like that:
-> visible penis that is not erect or visible vulva and as long as there is not contact with either of them = questionable
-> erect penis but as long as there is no sexual contact or sexual liquids on it and the picture is solo = questionable
-> erect penis when there is more than one character or if there is a sexual contact with genitals = explicit
Details:
→ Exposed genitals (vulva, penis, etc), as long as there is no sexual contact with them.
→ Images where the main focus are the character’s genitals, or images of butts and nothing else.
→ Whenever an image is warrant the specific tag of morbidly obese
→ No depictions of visible sexual arousal between 2 or more characters.
→ Sexual intercourse (sex)
→ Sexual liquids (precum, cum, vaginal secretions) or lubricants in contact with genitals
→ Masturbation or other sexual contact with genitals.
→ Genital insertions
→ Visible sexual arousal between 2 or more characters.
Tagging Discussion » Rating Tags General » Post 10
Nightweaver20xx
Ah sh*t here we go again
OK so I’m already confused. I just finished changing two tags that had visible male genitalia but were tagged “questionable” when I think they should be tagged “explicit” like on Derpi. Is that different here? Are we more liberal with what we can show? Someone inform me, because I’ve looked around and I can really only go by what I’ve been doing for years on Derpi.
EDIT: Never mind I’m an idiot apparently and didn’t actually read the tagging guidelines. I understand now, it’s different than Derpi.
EDIT: Never mind I’m an idiot apparently and didn’t actually read the tagging guidelines. I understand now, it’s different than Derpi.
Showing results 3751 - 3775 of 4468 total
Default search
If you do not specify a field to search over, the search engine will search for posts with a body that is similar to the query's word stems. For example, posts containing the words winged humanization, wings, and spread wings would all be found by a search for wing, but sewing would not be.
Allowed fields
| Field Selector | Type | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
author | Literal | Matches the author of this post. Anonymous authors will never match this term. | author:Joey |
body | Full Text | Matches the body of this post. This is the default field. | body:test |
created_at | Date/Time Range | Matches the creation time of this post. | created_at:2015 |
id | Numeric Range | Matches the numeric surrogate key for this post. | id:1000000 |
my | Meta | my:posts matches posts you have posted if you are signed in. | my:posts |
subject | Full Text | Matches the title of the topic. | subject:time wasting thread |
topic_id | Literal | Matches the numeric surrogate key for the topic this post belongs to. | topic_id:7000 |
topic_position | Numeric Range | Matches the offset from the beginning of the topic of this post. Positions begin at 0. | topic_position:0 |
updated_at | Date/Time Range | Matches the creation or last edit time of this post. | updated_at.gte:2 weeks ago |
user_id | Literal | Matches posts with the specified user_id. Anonymous users will never match this term. | user_id:211190 |
forum | Literal | Matches the short name for the forum this post belongs to. | forum:meta |