Posts

Description on chains should be fixed to:  

 
Also “semi-grimdark” is still present when uploading/editing tags, despite being retired.

@LightningBolt  
True. Though I meant to focus on “around one leg” separation. Hope that still counts.

@Hoffun Way  
I have a better idea, alias it into underwear around leg and underwear pulled down because separting themn is stupid.

[NSFW]  
So there’s this panties around leg tag, singular “leg”. I think it would be sensible to have it applied specifically to when the panties are around only one leg, like >>25321, >>24168, >>1690.  
And for panties around both legs like >>24234, >>19897, >>11107, having panties pulled down should be enough.  
Would this make sense? _{I just feel that panties around one leg should be its own thing.}
 
panties around leg***s*** is aliased into panties around leg, though.

@Fleetfoot  
it doesn’t have to have a tag, i was just tagging what was notable in the image /shrug
 
i do think the end and the nether are useful tags regardless though since they’re places, not objects. i can add disambiguation if needed

@dream  
Things like “abandon mineshaft” really needs a tag? That aside things like “end crystal” and “the end” feels too generic to bound to Minecraft might be better to do disambiguation.

yellow tag:  
minecraft earth (imply minecraft)  
desc: Minecraft’s spinoff mobile game based on augmented reality.
 
general implications:  
abandon mineshaft -> minecraft  
elytra -> minecraft  
end crystal -> minecraft  
redstone -> minecraft  
the end -> minecraft  
the nether -> minecraft  
prismarine -> minecraft

@Radomila Radon  
Was simply missed before. Fixed.

Why the tag dr.seuss should not in yellow tag? He’s an IRL human. I hope you explain.

@Radomila Radon  
Done, but this is not the right thread ;)

rhythm heaven (yellow tag) should implies to the tag nintendo

@CruFox  
I mean, male gryphon also works until it goes beyond solo pics. Tag searches are never going to be exact.

@Gyro  

 
It works… but only until you go beyond solo pictures ;)
 
For example male can be muscular but not the female, searching for “muscles, female” will bring muscular males because they are in the same picture as females.

I admit, I’m of the opinion and in agreement with LB that muscles, male, and muscles, female seems liek the better way to go here. Joint tags are kinda dumb. I’d nuke solo male, and solo female while I was at it.

@LightningBolt
 
@Teaspoon  
Agreed. It seems to pop up more and more.

@LightningBolt  
I’d say it’s likely enough of a “fetish” that it merits a tag (and yes, same for male).

@Anonymous #E1D0  
I’m hesitant to do that as there is already enough tags that can be used to find the same results, and many basic tags should just be added to images instead to better categorize instead of gendering random fetishes.
 
Yes without the tag there will be no way to find 100% muscular females in art if you don’t -male, but this is true of any fetish. I don’t create male pissing on female just to find things I like, I just search more generally and just scroll past the stuff I don’t care for.
 
I see no point to this tag myself for those reasons. I would rather enforce proper tagging of basic things and to remind people that tags are never going to be perfect and catch everything and make a flawless search of just what you personally want. I can’t even do that with basic sex.
 
Alternatively, make a muscular male tag to, don’t assume things. :P

Muscular female -> female, muscular, muscles

@Hoffun Way  
Others:
 
stockings implies clothing, which is aliased to clothes
 
muscular male implies muscular, aliased to muscles
 
moth changeling implies mlp, aliased to my little pony
 
peaheron implies peacock, aliased to peafowl

flaaffy and fearow need their implications of pokemon changed to pokémon.
 
>>17641, >>21927 and >>22246 need the pokemon tag removed. (I recall that this requires a temporary un-alias?)

sorry for doublepost.
 
glamfur description:
 
“A furry art style and subculture that peaked in popularity in the 2000s. It is seeing a slight resurgence alongside the rise of the scenecore aesthetic.
 
Glamfur art often includes overdesigned characters, anime/manga inspired styles, elements from alternative subcultures (including but not limited to goth, rave, cyberpunk, scene and visual kei), ridiculous amounts of accessories, gore and other dark subject matter, bright colors and overly sweet visuals and unusual or “weird” art styles.”
 
I was thinking of adding a link to this old Livejournal post about what elements make up glamfur, but I can’t figure out where to put it in that description. xP

is it possible to make other prefixes automatically pink for fan content like “comic:” does? bc i have a few i’ve been using
 
tumblr: - iirc this is also used on derpibooru, used to group askblog related images (edit: yes, it is)  
zine: - for fanzines  
amv: - i’ve been using this for images based on/frames from warriors amvs, but can be used for other fandom amvs  
map: - same as above but for multi-animator projects

Also this tag is a yellow tag  
friendlystock (desc: https://friendlystock.com/ )

Yellow tags: (I’m not sure on other tags)  
dr. seuss  
pixiv (desc: The highly improved Japanese version of Deviant Art)  
zomcom  
dragon tales  
patreon

@Somedragonguy  
There is a tag called ambient wildlife that is for:
 

So for example I didn’t use the tag “feral” here:  
 
because the birds in the background are just a mere black specks on the sky :P
 
But this tag should not be used for cases where the animals that are not the main characters are interacting in some way with the main characters, for example:  
 
And because in your example the character is looking at that butterfly this tag would not apply. So I think in cases like that the “feral” should be used, because why should we discriminate characters based on their species or size. I personally thing it’s only fair to omit it when they are not important to the point where removing them changes nothing like with “ambient wildlife”, but that’s just my opinion and maybe other staff members will disagree with me ;)
 
EDIT: But there might be cases of “ambient wildlife” where the background characters are fleshed out enough so that they would deserve their feral tag, for example birds on the right of the main character here: