![](https://furrycdn.org/avatars/2020/7/13/159460668061915002357775.jpg)
What do you think about this issue?
I just feel though that ultra small breasts should still apply like instances below:
Characters with no breasts at all get “flat chest” tag. They might have nipples. Examples:
also this one because those are the size of male pecs:
also this one because it doesn’t look like like there is any bump under this bra (although from the text in the speech bubble it would seem that breasts are there but just so flat that they “disappear”):
Characters with small breasts get “small breasts” tag, so examples of those would be:
flat chest
” = “small breasts
” - small breasts only no breasts
” - no breasts onlyflat chest
” - no breasts only small breasts
” - small breasts onlyflat chest, -breasts
” and the “no breasts” tag would not be needed at all. So in this other variant it would be:flat chest
” - both small breasts and no breasts flat chest, breasts
” - small breasts only flat chest, -breasts
” - no breasts onlyI stand by what I said regarding “flat chest” referring to a-cups and below. I have no problem with “small breasts” being used to refer to A-C cups at the uploader’s discretion, within reason (not washboard flat or “relatively small by furry porn standards”).
I would prefer that cases where a character/species that usually has breasts being pictured without them (“no breasts”) and vice versa, a character/species that normally doesn’t being emboobened be treated the same way: only tag the presence or absence when it is a deviation from the norm. Much the same way you wouldn’t normally tag lips on a human but you sure would on a bird.
These are equivalent UK cup volumes.
Furbooru is not cheap to operate - help support us financially!