General Tag Discussion

Muscular female -> female, muscular, muscles

@Anonymous #E1D0  
I’m hesitant to do that as there is already enough tags that can be used to find the same results, and many basic tags should just be added to images instead to better categorize instead of gendering random fetishes.
 
Yes without the tag there will be no way to find 100% muscular females in art if you don’t -male, but this is true of any fetish. I don’t create male pissing on female just to find things I like, I just search more generally and just scroll past the stuff I don’t care for.
 
I see no point to this tag myself for those reasons. I would rather enforce proper tagging of basic things and to remind people that tags are never going to be perfect and catch everything and make a flawless search of just what you personally want. I can’t even do that with basic sex.
 
Alternatively, make a muscular male tag to, don’t assume things. :P

@LightningBolt  
I’d say it’s likely enough of a “fetish” that it merits a tag (and yes, same for male).

@LightningBolt
 
@Teaspoon  
Agreed. It seems to pop up more and more.

I admit, I’m of the opinion and in agreement with LB that muscles, male, and muscles, female seems liek the better way to go here. Joint tags are kinda dumb. I’d nuke solo male, and solo female while I was at it.

@Gyro  

 
It works… but only until you go beyond solo pictures ;)
 
For example male can be muscular but not the female, searching for “muscles, female” will bring muscular males because they are in the same picture as females.

@CruFox  
I mean, male gryphon also works until it goes beyond solo pics. Tag searches are never going to be exact.

rhythm heaven (yellow tag) should implies to the tag nintendo

@Radomila Radon  
Done, but this is not the right thread ;)

Why the tag dr.seuss should not in yellow tag? He’s an IRL human. I hope you explain.

@Radomila Radon  
Was simply missed before. Fixed.

yellow tag:  
minecraft earth (imply minecraft)  
desc: Minecraft’s spinoff mobile game based on augmented reality.
 
general implications:  
abandon mineshaft -> minecraft  
elytra -> minecraft  
end crystal -> minecraft  
redstone -> minecraft  
the end -> minecraft  
the nether -> minecraft  
prismarine -> minecraft

@dream  
Things like “abandon mineshaft” really needs a tag? That aside things like “end crystal” and “the end” feels too generic to bound to Minecraft might be better to do disambiguation.

@Fleetfoot  
it doesn’t have to have a tag, i was just tagging what was notable in the image /shrug
 
i do think the end and the nether are useful tags regardless though since they’re places, not objects. i can add disambiguation if needed

[NSFW]  
So there’s this panties around leg tag, singular “leg”. I think it would be sensible to have it applied specifically to when the panties are around only one leg, like >>25321, >>24168, >>1690.  
And for panties around both legs like >>24234, >>19897, >>11107, having panties pulled down should be enough.  
Would this make sense? %I just feel that panties around one leg should be its own thing.%
 
panties around leg***s*** is aliased into panties around leg, though.

@Hoffun Way  
I have a better idea, alias it into underwear around leg and underwear pulled down because separting themn is stupid.

@LightningBolt  
True. Though I meant to focus on “around one leg” separation. Hope that still counts.

Description on chains should be fixed to:  

 
Also “semi-grimdark” is still present when uploading/editing tags, despite being retired.

@Somedragonguy  

 
Fixed, mistake with copy-pasting :P  

Tags with image count equal to 0 will show up as suggestions, the tag would have to be entirely nuked for it not to happen but then there wouldn’t be even tag edit history.

@CruFox  
No, I mean like on the page when uploading, under the “Ratings” section, it still shows semi-grimdark.

@Somedragonguy  
Quick tags is significantly outdated, we will overhaul it before long as it’s been one of the more recent discussions back at the discord server.

Does anyone have an idea for characters in stuff such as a box, jar, cup, etc other than the tags “Character in a X”?

@Anonymous #C287  
what’s wrong with “character in a x” though

Should webcomic characters use OC tags or character tags?

@Somedragonguy  
twokinds uses character tags, so i assume character tags?