Viewing last 25 versions of post by Anonymous #C8B4 in topic Basic implications and aliases

"[@zBL4CKGH0STz":](/forums/tagging/topics/basic-implications-and-aliases?post_id=30632#post_30632

)
 
Hmm. Okay. If not a positive implication, how about a negative implication? "[vulva":](/tags/vulva) implies neither "[rating:safe":](/tags/safe) nor "[rating:suggestive":](/tags/suggestive)?
 
Alternatively let additional ratings be submitted and strip out the lower ratings?

"@zBL4CKGH0STz":/forums/tagging/topics/basic-implications-and-aliases?post_id=30632#post_30632

Hmm. Okay. If not a positive implication, how about a negative implication? "vulva":/tags/vulva implies neither "rating:safe":/tags/safe nor "rating:suggestive":/tags/suggestive?