Viewing last 25 versions of post by Inocroft in topic Feedback conerns over moderation.

As seen with the utter mess derpi is STILL in.
 
I have a genuine concern that the mod team here will end up causing something simular, with them sharing simular roles in derpiboru.


 
I know Rule 5 bans intolerant content, but considering the inconsistent rulings by the mods on derpi without any feed back there is a concern.


 
I'd argue that there should be a clear framework for the mods to work from than vague self interpretation. Any moderation or rejection of a report ought to contain the reason WHY the mod decided it and a means to appeal the decision. (especially an explanation why the comment/upload breaks the rule cited).
 
TLDR: concern over constancy & transparency over moderation.

As seen with the utter mess derpi is STILL in.
I have a genuine concern that the mod team here will end up causing something simular, with them sharing simular roles in derpiboru.

I know Rule 5 bans intolerant content, but considering the inconsistent rulings by the mods on derpi without any feed back there is a concern.

I'd argue that there should be a clear framework for the mods to work from than vague self interpretation. Any moderation or rejection of a report ought to contain the reason WHY the mod decided it and a means to appeal the decision. (especially an explanation why the comment/upload breaks the rule cited)