Moon Flower 
"[@Zuthal":](/forums/meta/topics/concerning-rule-changes-on-banning-human-on-feral-porn?post_id=9940#post_9940
)
Art can be non-fictional. Filming, photography, literature concerning real happenings, etc.. I know you meant drawings, but I had to point it out. (But even then there's the technique of drawing over photographies.)
"
[@Anonymous #EA4B":](/forums/meta/topics/concerning-rule-changes-on-banning-human-on-feral-porn?post_id=9948#post_9948
)
This pretty much. I don't know why the rule change is there, but I guess it has to do with laws, and if someone gets pissed, they'll look at the pictures, and not whatever stories people invented.
I personally would have guessed either none of the lions or all except the last one.
And the jackalope would be not okay to me in my opinion, just like putting cat ears and a tail on an underage human character.
Other than that about real but extinct animals, such as dinosaurs?
At another note, if I got that rule correctly, I assume that means two animals doing it like animals - or anthropomorphic with animal - would still be okay?
Moon?
Art can be non-fictional. Filming, photography, literature concerning real happenings, etc.. I know you meant drawings, but I had to point it out. (But even then there's the technique of drawing over photographies.)
"
[@Anonymous #EA4B
This pretty much. I don't know why the rule change is there, but I guess it has to do with laws, and if someone gets pissed, they'll look at the pictures, and not whatever stories people invented.
I personally would have guessed either none of the lions or all except the last one.
And the jackalope would be not okay to me in my opinion, just like putting cat ears and a tail on an underage human character.
Other than that about real but extinct animals, such as dinosaurs?
At another note, if I got that rule correctly, I assume that means two animals doing it like animals - or anthropomorphic with animal - would still be okay?