Note that Derpi rules have a lot of piss at suggestive and if this site is being kinder on nudity then why not be kinder to fetishes? it makes no sense to say that breasts are suggestive and piss is questionable, even if it’s a tiny implied stream.
I wasn’t under the impression that we’re being kinder to nudity per se. I was more under the impression that the bar for “explicit” or “questionable” was higher. Not the bar for “suggestive”. Based on the guidelines, the “safe” rating is still for non-sexual things only.
I don’t personally care whether it’s a lot of piss or two drops, just as I don’t care whether it’s a flood of cum or two drops. Those are still both NSFW in my eyes. Implied urination is a different story, and I would be completely fine with that being “suggestive” personally, just like how massive hyper boobs can be “suggestive” here.
I also have no problem being sex-positive, but the people who want to be SFW only should be allowed to be SFW only. Ace people exist, and they shouldn’t be forced to look at all my weird “safe” porn, ya know?
If we’re going to put pissing fetish work in the “safe” category, then maybe make a new public filter for actual safe content that filters out all the “safe” vore, “safe” bondage, and so on. A lot of these things don’t require nudity to be purely masturbation material. There’s a reason Derpi marks nearly all “mawshots” as suggestive or questionable–cus that’s just porn.
Most of the pony fetish clop I’ve drawn in my life has had no nudity, but I absolutely made that clop with the intention of giving the client something to jerk it to.
I think depictions of urine fall roughly into two categories: crude humor, and sexual undertones. There’s overlap for sure, but the jump from “none at all” to “fetish” leaves very little that’s exclusively in the first category…and pretty much none of that involves nudity at all.
As for crude humour stuff–yes that probably could get tagged as safe in a lot of cases. Fair enough! However, none of the original images in my eyes are about crude humour.
If we’re going to compromise, I’ll be fine with a compromise for “suggestive”, but then I would recommend modifying the existing guidelines of suggestive to be clear that “sexual urination” is only suggestive.