[NSFW] How to tag females without breasts - "flat chest" or "no breasts"?

@Moon Flower  
I’ve always done it in comparison to head size

@Blissey1  
That makes sense.

So, what’s the standing here?

@Fleetfoot  
I think, distraction of cup sizes (and an acknowledgement that it’s a relative measure, and intentionally so) aside, there doesn’t seem to be much disagreement about the way these tags should be used, just quibbling over exactly how to define the de facto usage.
 
Short version: Very small breasts/no breasts should be tagged “flat chest,” below-average breast sizes should be tagged “small breasts.” The no breasts tag would therefore be redundant as it would only be used to tag flat chest and things that never had breasts in the first place…which, if they’re to be tagged at all, would also be tagged flat chest if it’s a noteworthy feature.

transmale/cuntboi I’m more comfortable with, especially if the character is a male. Cuntboy is rather derogatory so I would go with trans male unless they have small breasts.

@sangie  
I think we’re talking about females with no breasts, not males.

@sangie  
cuntboy is aliased into intersex male, this discussion is about how to tag female characters. Some species just don’t have breasts at all on their females, doesn’t make them not female.

@CruFox  

 
Oh sorry. I would go with no breasts if it hasn’t been decided yet. If flat chest is used, that would be used on twink/femboy males too.