CruFox
Moderator
I like tags
Simple implications as on Derpi:
"double anal":/tags/double+anal -> "anal":/tags/anal
"double anal":/tags/double+anal -> "penetration":/tags/penetration
"double anal":/tags/double+anal -> "sex":/tags/sex
but there are other tags implied by "double anal" on Derpi as to which I am not so sure.
The first one is "double penetration". But then how to differentiate between situation where one character is penetrated both anally and vaginally (in two orifices at once) by two other characters from the situation where it's two characters and one orifice then? Somebody would have to search for "double penetration, -double anal, -double vaginal" to get just that. On e621 "double penetration" is separate from those other two "doubles".
The second is "multiple penetration". I can see this working better as an umbrella term for both "_two characters, two orifices_" and "two characters, one orifice". Then double penetration would not be implied by "double anal" and mean only "_two characters, two orifices_"
"double anal":/tags/double+anal -> "anal":/tags/anal
"double anal":/tags/double+anal -> "penetration":/tags/penetration
"double anal":/tags/double+anal -> "sex":/tags/sex
but there are other tags implied by "double anal" on Derpi as to which I am not so sure.
The first one is "double penetration". But then how to differentiate between situation where one character is penetrated both anally and vaginally (in two orifices at once) by two other characters from the situation where it's two characters and one orifice
The second is "multiple penetration". I can see this working better as an umbrella term for both "_two characters, two orifices_" and "two characters, one orifice". Then double penetration would not be implied by "double anal" and mean only "_two characters, two orifices_"