@MagpulDynamicPie
Interesting. I’m sort of in favor of gun control, but in a different way than how we do it or how most people do it.
I think one of the top things we could do to control gun violence would be to make
legal immigration easier and
then crack down more on illegal immigration. Instead of forcing people, the vast majority of which are benign, but some of which are gangsters smuggling things into the country, to come here illegally, we should be letting them come in through checkpoints.
Legal immigration takes
years through the Mexican border. Meanwhile these people are oftentimes fleeing starvation-level poverty and massive violence caused by our drug war as well as their home country’s injustices and corruption. It’s not hard to see why these people often can’t afford to take 2,3,4,5 or more years to come here legally.
It’s well-nigh impossible to reasonably “win” the war on illegal immigration when we have so many benign immigrants coming in with the bad apples at the same time. There’s millions, and it’s way too many to deal with. I propose doing whatever we have to to lower the barrier to illegal immigration down to like a week or 2 instead of years. Basically, the people can come to checkpoints and get photographed and fingerprinted, and tell us their name and give us ID if they have it. (I know they can use fake names and might not have IDs, but it’s better than nothing.) Then what we do is run a background check on them based on what days we have- the fingerprints photos, etc. If it comes up in the system, we deal with them accordingly. If it doesn’t, we let them in and create some sort of possible path to citizenship if they’re willing to do what’s necessary. (I’m fine with figuring out and debating that part. I’m not sure what the best thing to do as far as that goes anyway.)
Then we can more reasonably enforce our illegal immigration policies and a lot of these “safe haven” cities would be more comfortable with going after new illegal immigrants. The main reason a lot of people don’t want to go after illegal immigrants as it is is because so many of them are just honest workers who want to come here to make an honest life. They should be more open to swift and decisive deportation of the ones who choose to ignore the checkpoints and the system if the system is made more accessible in the first place.
If we deport more illegals while simultaneously getting more legal people here on the record, we can more safely keep track of who is here, which will ultimately help fight violence of all types, including gun violence.
Oh last thing about that, in order to make it work we also have to require all illegal immigrants already here to go get fingerprinted and photographed and put into the system. If they refuse, they get deported.
I think another thing we could do is treat guns like cars, where you need to take a very basic test to show you know how to be a responsible gun owner/user to have them. And if you use/possess them without it, you can be punished.
But then no bans. I’m not a fan of banning people from having what they feel is necessary for their preps or their lifestyle, etc. If you want to have a tank, artillery, a bump stock or a high capacity magazines, etc. you should be able to as long as you have the proper license that shows you know how to be safe, sane, and responsible with them.
Our constitution says we have the right to a “well-regulated” militia, not one free of regulation. So I’m fine with requiring basic licenses and then going after the people who disregard that requirement. We require people to have licenses to drive cars and I don’t see anyone complaining about that except
a few libertarian extremists.
I think short, but substantive waiting periods are also good. Combined with basic licensing on a federal level and no bans of any kind, I think it would strike a good balance between protecting our second amendment rights and policing gun violence, along with the aforementioned immigration reforms.